D
Deleted member 4749
Guest
When more than one person owns something, it's harder to take it away.
What do you think?
What do you think?
-
Welcome to DNForum.com™ - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars
If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the oldest global domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 45,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, using our free in-house built tools, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.
- Status
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2008
- Messages
- 1,228
- Reaction score
- 0
can you elaborate? it would not seem to matter. perhaps the fusu "shareholders" are more equipped to fight back, but that won't help prevent a domain from being swiped away.
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2005
- Messages
- 2,642
- Reaction score
- 1
i really like fusu concept- thought i don't think it can be anyhow related to snowbill prevention
also i doubt there will be really serious investor interest in to investing in domains over use of which they have no control at all, i mean if they accepting investor funds, they should at least not park domains like they did with rvx.com (serving trademarked ads) and do as much as they can to avoid being udpered
dono
also i doubt there will be really serious investor interest in to investing in domains over use of which they have no control at all, i mean if they accepting investor funds, they should at least not park domains like they did with rvx.com (serving trademarked ads) and do as much as they can to avoid being udpered
dono
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2006
- Messages
- 1,853
- Reaction score
- 13
filled out the forms for 20 domains at fusu, heard nothing at all from them.
- Status
