Wonder if Themeparks.us is a "great" name for .us extension (which I believe it is) then why go for another extension, especially such as .net. It'd be the same as suggesting .us extension for "url" (instead of .net). Secondly, why folks think $900 is good price for a "great" name with an intuitive and relevant extension (.us) while url.net (.net being a very relevant extension for url) has been appraised by many at much more. Which one has more type-ins? Per overture, its themeparks (68K vs. 44K for URL).