- Joined
- Feb 28, 2004
- Messages
- 30,303
- Reaction score
- 2,217
-
Welcome to DNForum.com™ - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars
If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the oldest global domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 45,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, using our free in-house built tools, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.
Tube domains sold for $750,000
- Thread starter Theo
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2005
- Messages
- 4,332
- Reaction score
- 171
I have heard people mention it is a fake report or a "pump" in other terms.
I agree with those people, too many red flags.
I agree with those people, too many red flags.
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2005
- Messages
- 4,332
- Reaction score
- 171
The only issue I have is similar names are essentially worthless except those owned and bought by 2 or 3 groups, who happen to have made this purchase too.
The second flag imo is no one in the world believes the value exists or their statement that the .com doesn't get the traffic their .xxx get...LOL do they think we are stupid?
I could literally have watched them hand $750k in cash, watch the deposit and still wouldn't buy it.
I ask myself what they have to gain by this release, both sides are now in too deep and it can only help, maybe, there may still be a few suckers left.
jmo, maybe I am wrong and tube(s).XXX is worth it! Think of the value of the other .xxx in private hands, billions of dollars floating around, Frank Schilling has made $4 billion based on the quality of his xxx names, right.
In the end I wonder who backers are in cases such as this because lets assume that it is all on the up and up, Frank spent X, this porn company spent X and so on, did they make a good investment, no.
So either they are multimillion dollar suckers, morons who thought it was worth it or in a round about numbered company way have an "interest".
Again, just my opinion, something isn't adding up.
The second flag imo is no one in the world believes the value exists or their statement that the .com doesn't get the traffic their .xxx get...LOL do they think we are stupid?
I could literally have watched them hand $750k in cash, watch the deposit and still wouldn't buy it.
I ask myself what they have to gain by this release, both sides are now in too deep and it can only help, maybe, there may still be a few suckers left.
jmo, maybe I am wrong and tube(s).XXX is worth it! Think of the value of the other .xxx in private hands, billions of dollars floating around, Frank Schilling has made $4 billion based on the quality of his xxx names, right.
In the end I wonder who backers are in cases such as this because lets assume that it is all on the up and up, Frank spent X, this porn company spent X and so on, did they make a good investment, no.
So either they are multimillion dollar suckers, morons who thought it was worth it or in a round about numbered company way have an "interest".
Again, just my opinion, something isn't adding up.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2004
- Messages
- 30,303
- Reaction score
- 2,217
Adult operators live in a parallel universe, and much of what they do can be incomprehensible. But there is plenty of money floating around - the particular buyers are from Europe where the adult industry is very healthy and money is at 30% premium, thanks to the euro. Every dollar spent is an investment that is based on performance, and while not every non-adult operator can afford to "test the waters" with $1.5 million of his own money like Frank, there has to be something to attract investors repeatedly.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2005
- Messages
- 4,332
- Reaction score
- 171
"We" do you have a film out lol
- Status
Similar threads
