Membership is FREE – with unlimited access to all features, tools, and discussions. Premium accounts get benefits like banner ads and newsletter exposure. ✅ Signature links are now free for all. 🚫 No AI-generated (LLM) posts allowed. Share your own thoughts and experience — accounts may be terminated for violations.
- IMHO - their standard of proof is "would an average person be confused as to ownership of that name" just by you asking the question here - you already know the answer - with Google and Froogle - the average person would be confused, and therefore they would have a case.
Remember, even if you are right, and they don't want you playing in their sandbox, they have more lawyers than you do - so their strategy would be to make you get a lawyer and drain away your resources - never needing to prove a point at all. just be careful
This may not be the wisest statement to make. The offer is instant bad faith if you happen to cross a lawyer with a chip on his shoulder... It does happen, though not frequently.
This may not be the wisest statement to make. The offer is instant bad faith if you happen to cross a lawyer with a chip on his shoulder... It does happen, though not frequently.