Since companies like Markmonitor International Canada Ltd. only exist to hold registrations, they have very low input costs - mainly invoices from Webnames.ca - and no real invoices to end-users since they bill from the U.S. parent to their customers. This means any VAT that Markmonitor International Canada Ltd. would be liable to pay would not have offsets to reduce the amount due. The result would see higher costs for its parent company and the customers of the parent company, so perhaps it is easier for them to avoid the VAT as they appear to do now.
Our deal that I refer to was with one the largest multi-nationals. Furthermore, we have also dealt with Mark Monitor Canada which _is_ an Hst registrant.
If you do not do it you can lose your registrations at CIRA apparently.
My post was ammended prior to your post. I clarified to say that MM had a front media company negotiate who referred to them as "their client". Gst was specified complete with amount and reg number and charged in the transaction. Presumably "the client" are the ones who sent the money to escrow.com and MM received the domain transfer. Thats why I stated that they "appear to be" a rant. I cant know for sure. I just know that they willingly paid gst in the amount of $1375 USD. So they must have a fair amount of money to throw around if this amount alone is not worth being a rant for. Anyway, I jumped in to this post merely to help out with your sedo situation not so much with our MM experience but our US parent - Canadian subsiduary sale. If it is of no help to you then just forget about it.
*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators