- Joined
- Oct 23, 2002
- Messages
- 3,142
- Reaction score
- 18
Last year I got hit with a UDRP on a very generic acronym domain. Approximately a dozen organizations around the world were using the initials. There was no exclusive use. There was no registered trademark.
The complainant hired a fellow WIPO arbitrator as their attorney, and the Australian panelist had a real attitude and made many errors.
In the end, the complainant was the sweet little charity, and I was the evil American cybersquatter. I lost the UDRP.
So, I filed a pro se lawsuit to vacate it, but proper service was not made. So, I hired a lawyer to re-file the lawsuit, but before re-filing, we settled.
The terms of the settlement were that the complainant would withdraw the UDRP, and I got a letter to that effect from the complainant saying they withdrew the UDRP.
The problem is that WIPO has not honored the agreement, and the awful erroneous UDRP is still published on the web.
How to resolved this and force WIPO to correct its records?
The complainant hired a fellow WIPO arbitrator as their attorney, and the Australian panelist had a real attitude and made many errors.
In the end, the complainant was the sweet little charity, and I was the evil American cybersquatter. I lost the UDRP.
So, I filed a pro se lawsuit to vacate it, but proper service was not made. So, I hired a lawyer to re-file the lawsuit, but before re-filing, we settled.
The terms of the settlement were that the complainant would withdraw the UDRP, and I got a letter to that effect from the complainant saying they withdrew the UDRP.
The problem is that WIPO has not honored the agreement, and the awful erroneous UDRP is still published on the web.
How to resolved this and force WIPO to correct its records?