Wls News = Nonsense

[Nic]

Wow talk about not knowing what the hell you are talking about.
Theregister has no idea when it comes to WLS .
Read this story...about as bad as 3month old unrefrigerated milk.

http://www.theregus.com/content/6/25650.html

"Under the plan, anyone will be able to pay SnapNames $35 to "reserve" a particular .com or .net domain name were it not to be renewed. VeriSign claims this will put an end to the race for domain names once they become available. "

not $35 but $69 -------------> mistake one
Snap name holders have no priority when it comes to WLS.
NO grandfathering

 

i think in the article they used snapnames to mean wls service provider.

 

Note below, it said : "nothing to high, $35USD sounds nice, a lot better then SnapNames $69USD"

 

[dotsofdomains]

The more I read, the more I get confused about WLS.

 

[Whois-Search]

alot better than bidding $1000 at Namewinner (Dotster)

if we don't get the good names now then why worry ???

 

[Nic]

i agree whois-search, but the point of this thread is how even the news agencies, have no clue when it comes to WLS.