- Joined
- Jul 10, 2003
- Messages
- 1,442
- Reaction score
- 0
Membership is FREE – with unlimited access to all features, tools, and discussions. Premium accounts get benefits like banner ads and newsletter exposure. ✅ Signature links are now free for all. 🚫 No AI-generated (LLM) posts allowed. Share your own thoughts and experience — accounts may be terminated for violations.
Worlds Smallest DotCom?
- Thread starter ComScout.com
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2002
- Messages
- 3,142
- Reaction score
- 18
It's OK. Tough to brand it tho.
'WWW' is about as brand unfriendly as you can get:
1. It is not distinctive.
2. It probably confuses many surfers who don't understand domains/ subdomains, etc..
3. It is at the end of any alphabetical listing.
4. "Double U, Double U, Double U" would be awkward in a radio spot.
That said, it is a good name to use for the traffic, as actnow suggests.
I would use the traffic to push something more brandable and marketable. The way they are using the domain now is bone-headed, IMO.
'WWW' is about as brand unfriendly as you can get:
1. It is not distinctive.
2. It probably confuses many surfers who don't understand domains/ subdomains, etc..
3. It is at the end of any alphabetical listing.
4. "Double U, Double U, Double U" would be awkward in a radio spot.
That said, it is a good name to use for the traffic, as actnow suggests.
I would use the traffic to push something more brandable and marketable. The way they are using the domain now is bone-headed, IMO.
- Status
Similar threads
