- Joined
- Jul 10, 2003
- Messages
- 1,442
- Reaction score
- 0
-
Welcome to DNForum.com - Domain Investor Forum, Free Domain Marketplace and a community for 45+ domain pros
If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the oldest global domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 45,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, using our free in-house built tools, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.
Worlds Smallest DotCom?
- Thread starter ComScout.com
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2002
- Messages
- 3,142
- Reaction score
- 18
It's OK. Tough to brand it tho.
'WWW' is about as brand unfriendly as you can get:
1. It is not distinctive.
2. It probably confuses many surfers who don't understand domains/ subdomains, etc..
3. It is at the end of any alphabetical listing.
4. "Double U, Double U, Double U" would be awkward in a radio spot.
That said, it is a good name to use for the traffic, as actnow suggests.
I would use the traffic to push something more brandable and marketable. The way they are using the domain now is bone-headed, IMO.
'WWW' is about as brand unfriendly as you can get:
1. It is not distinctive.
2. It probably confuses many surfers who don't understand domains/ subdomains, etc..
3. It is at the end of any alphabetical listing.
4. "Double U, Double U, Double U" would be awkward in a radio spot.
That said, it is a good name to use for the traffic, as actnow suggests.
I would use the traffic to push something more brandable and marketable. The way they are using the domain now is bone-headed, IMO.
- Status
Similar threads
