• Welcome to DNForum.com - Domain Investor Forum, Free Domain Marketplace and a community for 45+ domain pros
    If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the oldest global domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 45,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, using our free in-house built tools, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.

For Sale $$$ Y you should invest in 3 letter .us $$$

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 4749
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
To further build on Steve's statement above. The value of domains and the new tld's
is very similar to the cycle of raw land.

As the population expands and prospers, the need for more land is needed.

The .com can be visualized as the downtown property which will alway be in demand if it
is in a prime area.

The .org's can be the suburban area of the city. And, the value is continuing to rise.

And, the .info is the next ring of populated area.

Which, makes the .biz and .us the raw land further away from the city.

And, the secret of the underdeveloped tld's is to determine which direction the
population is moving.

Maybe, the .us land will take a little bit longer to be of major value. However, the land
still has value for agricultural use until it is needed.

The additional point to note is that crappy land will have very little potential for appreciation. And, crappy names are the same thing.

Therefore, my strategy is to buy prime or semi-prime locations within each tld cycles.

However, I don't know where to put .net within this example.
 
.net is the old landfill site that's just turned radioactive.
 
Richard - .nets are OK - Soft Seller's but OK domains - Beats a .ws domain all day long - Just my thoughts - Steve
 
URLCollection said:
put .nets in the vault - They are just fine with us and have been for years.

Steve, you are "preaching to the choir". I buy .net's all of the time.

Duke and I argue/discuss at least once a week over the potential value of .net.

However, I would appreciate it if you would not tell anyone else in the domain
business that .net's have value. I need to increase my collection! :-D
 
actnow said:
However, I would appreciate it if you would not tell anyone else in the domain business that .net's have value. I need to increase my collection!

.NET's have a chronic 2nd class citizen status. Even .ORGs are loads better, at least they connote, I'm not as dirty as .COM.
 
OK Richard - Duke and I have discussed that as well - "They really are a soft seller" but better than a .ws domain I guess - Edited above - Steve
 
Buydomains have loads of .NET acquired through the drop system, but I doubt they will get many buyers for them. It's like an extension that has now become something between the devil and the deep blue sea. You develop a .net without a .com, and all you are doing is to set yourself up for massive leakage to the .com site. .NET is more a defensive reg than anything else now, imho - used for 404 errors or URL forwarding.
 
actnow said:
The .com can be visualized as the downtown property which will alway be in demand if it is in a prime area.

The only difference is that there's still golden opportunities in .com at rock-bottom prices because so many people abandon their prime area locations without explanation (i.e. great names still drop).

The problem is that it's like a lottery and your chances are only improved if you can find the best abandoned locations well before anyone else so you can backorder (and pray). That is why many people -like myself- have proprietary software to assist in this effort.

I would not suggest that other TLDs are not highly lucrative, but IF you have an edge -like I do- then .com is still the most lucrative way to go ...for now. Although, having said that, I have been on the prowl for other prime locations in other extensions as well... never hurts to diversify ;)

Cheers,

Wesley
 
Interesting enough I was just offered 100 euros for a .us 3 char I picked up on a drop
 
strongvis said:
Interesting enough I was just offered 100 euros for a .us 3 char I picked up on a drop

mp3.us? : )
 
strongvis said:
Interesting enough I was just offered 100 euros for a .us 3 char I picked up on a drop

See that guys, euros for a .us
 
Blink said:
Dude, your avatar is disturbing, why do we need to see it?

Wanted to say that for a while myself :bandit:
 
I guess this kinds of images are beyond inappropriate on professional forums.
 
Blink said:
I guess this kinds of images are beyond inappropriate on professional forums.

(bah) Too each his own (bah)
 
Blink said:
Dude, your avatar is disturbing, why do we need to see it?...I guess this (sic) kinds of images are beyond inappropriate on professional forums.

Blink, I dont know you like I know some of the people here...
I'm real easy to get along with.

As far as my avatar goes -
In all actuality, what's inappropriate is someone making childish comments in a public forum like that. Send me a PM if you have something to ask. But dont expect a reply if it's not relative to the essence of my time here.

If the avatar disturbs you, you have the option to show or hide various elements of messages, which may be of use to users on slow internet connections, or who want to remove extraneous clutter from posts.
Just click your User CP - edit options and untick the box next to "Show Avatars". You don't need to see it, Blink. I'm glad to hold your hand and teach you how not to.

Comments out of the blue about someone's avatar, man get a life.

I'll change my avatar when I feel like it.
Be it sooner or later.
:ok:
 
I like not having any Avatar at all but many domainers love them so I will not say anything negative about them.

P.S. Why does Blink not have a No Avatar Graphic like I have, which I wish I did not have at all as Blink does not have it?
 
RealNames said:
I like not having any Avatar at all but many domainers love them so I will not say anything negative about them.

P.S. Why does Blink not have a No Avatar Graphic like I have, which I wish I did not have at all as Blink does not have it?

If you notice his country spot is blank, it seems as if he has his avatar as the country flag.

I hate that no avatar thing, in any event I think I have a more than acceptable avatar.

P.S. This thread is turning from topic to topic :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom