Membership is FREE – with unlimited access to all features, tools, and discussions. Premium accounts get benefits like banner ads and newsletter exposure. ✅ Signature links are now free for all. 🚫 No AI-generated (LLM) posts allowed. Share your own thoughts and experience — accounts may be terminated for violations.
closed Zeqo . Com
- Thread starter steitieh
- Start date
This thread has been closed by the original author or DNF staff member.
- Status
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2006
- Messages
- 2,292
- Reaction score
- 65
high xx low xxx
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2002
- Messages
- 959
- Reaction score
- 0
High XXX to low XXXX
People need to understand that the same rules of good and bad letters for 3 letter names don't really hold true for pronouncable CVCVs. Especially the Z.
The Q generally is a problem though because it can be confused with a C or K.
I feel that is the only thing holding the name back from being a sure fire X,XXX name.
It is helped by the O at the end though. Probably the best V to end a pronouncable CVCV names.
That said, it would more than likely push X,XXX on sedo and if it dropped on SnapNames there is no doubt it would easily be in the X,XXX range.
You could probably add another $100-$300 for the whole set IMO.
People need to understand that the same rules of good and bad letters for 3 letter names don't really hold true for pronouncable CVCVs. Especially the Z.
The Q generally is a problem though because it can be confused with a C or K.
I feel that is the only thing holding the name back from being a sure fire X,XXX name.
It is helped by the O at the end though. Probably the best V to end a pronouncable CVCV names.
That said, it would more than likely push X,XXX on sedo and if it dropped on SnapNames there is no doubt it would easily be in the X,XXX range.
You could probably add another $100-$300 for the whole set IMO.
- Status
Similar threads
