For Sale 00.org

[cokee]

It was proposed to drop on 26.11.2002, but ownership changed before it drops.. so strange ..

 

[PrimeDNR]

Hmm!

It was transferred to PairNIC.com.


Strange!

Regards

- PD

 

[G.A.]

Snapnames just grabbed it for the new registrant! Pairnic is one of SN's partners.

 

[PrimeDNR]

Originally posted by G.A.
Snapnames just grabbed it for the new registrant! Pairnic is one of SN's partners.

Dear G.A.

May I ask how can you know that snapnames has grabbed it ..

Anyway secret? Please kindly PM me if it is a secret.


Many thanks


- PD -

 

[morel]

It's not a secret. If an expired domain suddenly ends up with one of these registrars, it is because SnapNames got it:

VeriSign
BulkRegister
Namescout
Directi
DomainPeople
DomainSite
NamesBeyond
4Domains
domaindiscount24
TotalRegistrations
NameSystem
1dni
NameBay
pairNIC
EnCirca

 

[PrimeDNR]

Originally posted by morel
It's not a secret. If an expired domain suddenly ends up with one of these registrars, it is because SnapNames got it:

VeriSign
BulkRegister
Namescout
Directi
DomainPeople
DomainSite
NamesBeyond
4Domains
domaindiscount24
TotalRegistrations
NameSystem
1dni
NameBay
pairNIC
EnCirca

Dear Morel,

May I ask if the domain is registered in MelbourneIT or Directnic.com ... Is Snapname has better chance? Or Dropwizards or Namewinner.

I have 2 loved name in these 2 register that expired.

Many thanks

- PD -

 

[G.A.]

PrimeDNR,

I originally thought that Snapnames can easily grab MbIT's name.......but later I know that it's wrong. For example: Poisoning.Com[formerly reg. through MbIT].

I am not very familiar with catching DirectNIC's drops. Sorry!



G.A.

 

[G.A.]

Originally posted by G.A.

I am not very familiar with catching DirectNIC's drops. Sorry!

But Snapnames JUST grabbed Propagandist.Com(formerly reg. thru DirectNIC) for Ultimate Search [ULT]--- One of the most out-standing dropcatchers on this planet.

 

[PrimeDNR]

Originally posted by G.A.




But Snapnames JUST grabbed Propagandist.Com(formerly reg. thru DirectNIC) for Ultimate Search [ULT]--- One of the most out-standing dropcatchers on this planet.

Never mind

Thanks G.A.

But How can you know that it has justed grabbed it? It grabbed it for you?



Regards

- PD -

 

[G.A.]

Take a look at the WHOIS results for Propagandist.Com


*****
Registrant:
Ultimate Search
GPO Box 7862
Central, HK HK
na

Registrar: NameSecure.com
Domain: PROPAGANDIST.COM
Created on 11-22-2002
Expires on 11-22-2003

[...]

*****


See the date?

 

[RMF]

I wonder if UltSearch ever lets domains expire...hmm

RMF

 

[G.A.]

I ambiguously remember that 3G.COM once gone expired, but ULT renewed the registration few days later.

[I said 'ambiguously', it means I maybe wrong :embarrass]

 

[PrimeDNR]

Originally posted by G.A.
Take a look at the WHOIS results for Propagandist.Com


*****
Registrant:
Ultimate Search
GPO Box 7862
Central, HK HK
na

Registrar: NameSecure.com
Domain: PROPAGANDIST.COM
Created on 11-22-2002
Expires on 11-22-2003

[...]

*****


See the date?

Oh I See

Thanks G.A.

Ultsearch is in Hong Kong?

Do they offer service like snapname?

I have try to visit their website but no such back order information is mentioned there?

Thanks in advance!


Regards

- PD -

 

[G.A.]

Oh, sorry for misleading you!

Snapnames is the drop-catching service provider and ULT itself is SN's customer and of course the 'REGISTRANT' of a domain name. In other words, 'registrant' is ultimately the 'owner' of a domain name.

ULT is of course a HK company. Aren't you proud of them?

 

[PrimeDNR]

Originally posted by G.A.
Oh, sorry for misleading you!

Snapnames is the drop-catching service provider and ULT itself is SN's customer and of course the 'REGISTRANT' of a domain name. In other words, 'registrant' is ultimately the 'owner' of a domain name.

ULT is of course a HK company. Aren't you proud of them?

Hmm! Not really!

First of all, they are great in getting all the good name.

But I have heard from forum members that they charge a lot for transfer the good name to the customers?

They are bad if they have a lot of funds and registered a lot of good name (by Snapname) first . You know you lost the snapname as services if they did it first but you got to have 69 for each snapname?

Regards

- PD -

 

[G.A.]

Originally posted by PrimeDNR

Hmm! Not really!

First of all, they are great in getting all the good name.

But I have heard from forum members that they charge a lot for transfer the good name to the customers?

They are bad if they have a lot of funds and registered a lot of good name (by Snapname) first . You know you lost the snapname as services if they did it first but you got to have 69 for each snapname?

Regards

- PD -

First-Come First-Serve! this is the gamerules of dropcatching!

Unquestionably I would regarded their behavior as 'bad' if they registers/grabs domains which are identical to someone's trademarks.

It's realistic...isn't it?

 

[PrimeDNR]

Originally posted by G.A.




First-Come First-Serve! this is the gamerules of dropcatching!

Unquestionably I would regarded their behavior as 'bad' if they registers/grabs domains which are identical to someone's trademarks.

It's realistic...isn't it?

Agreed! G.A.

It is better than Bidding which can hurt by those bad guy (you may paid more than Snap)..

Regards

- PD -

 

[G.A.]

ULT has got involved in domain-name disputes for many times:


[cases they win]


FirstAmerican.com
GroceryOutlet.com
Matress.Com
Mutineer.Com
Paparazzo.Com
PWC.com
WBW.com
(...etc)


[cases they lost]

Edmund.com
Edmunds.com

 

[G.A.]

ULT grabbed CCP.org thru SnapNames few days ago, PD!


* * * * *

CCP = Chinese Communist[or Capitalist ] Party

.org = most common gTLD for political organizations

 

[cokee]

Wow!