Membership is FREE – with unlimited access to all features, tools, and discussions. Premium accounts get benefits like banner ads and newsletter exposure. ✅ Signature links are now free for all. 🚫 No AI-generated (LLM) posts allowed. Share your own thoughts and experience — accounts may be terminated for violations.

2/3 character number names

Status
Not open for further replies.

cyphix

Level 9
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2003
Messages
3,609
Reaction score
1
Are 2/3 character number domains generally more valueable than 2/3 character letter domains, or does it matter what the number is? Like would 484.com be decent or would it have to be something nice like 300.com, 411.com etc?

I should imagine they are worth more cause there are less around but they also would lose value because a end-user is more likely to use a letter domain than a number domain.
 

Mr Webname

Oldbie
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2003
Messages
3,743
Reaction score
0
I would say that a meaningful 2/3 letter domain is always going to be worth more than a 2/3 number domain as generally speaking the letters will mean something and can be identifiable with something/someone and are more likely to be entered on a search (when did you last enter www.(number).com?
There are, of course, always going to be exceptions - 911 for the US springs to mind as does 999 for the UK and there will be many others. In most instances you would be looking at novelty/rarity value rather than usefulness.
 

GiantDomains

President
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2002
Messages
6,569
Reaction score
1
Originally posted by cyphix
Are 2/3 character number domains generally more valueable than 2/3 character letter domains, or does it matter what the number is?
Generally speaking, Yes.

543.com is much more valuable that 4q1.com.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

The Rule #1

Do not insult any other member. Be polite and do business. Thank you!

Premium Members

Latest Listings

Our Mods' Businesses

*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators

Top Bottom