- Joined
- Jul 12, 2005
- Messages
- 4,335
- Reaction score
- 171
Adam, I seen the ruling on the King.net member and have to disagree, respectfully of course. The other thread was closed so I couldnt post this.
The issue I take is this, while ultimately the sedo deal was not a deal that fell through here, A) It started here B)The commnuity is in danger as long as he remains and C)I left namepros.com for the EXACT principal, had them close my account completely a year ago.
I do not feel comforted knowing someone who is a scum bag is allowed to remain simply because it wasn't done here, we should be more concerned not with where it happened but with where that member is allowed to continue to operate ( remember it stared here! ).
Just my opinion but for the greater good is my thinking. We wouldnt allow molesters or murderers etc to sleep over our home simply because there offense wasn't at our house. Drastic comparison I know but just making a point.
The issue I take is this, while ultimately the sedo deal was not a deal that fell through here, A) It started here B)The commnuity is in danger as long as he remains and C)I left namepros.com for the EXACT principal, had them close my account completely a year ago.
I do not feel comforted knowing someone who is a scum bag is allowed to remain simply because it wasn't done here, we should be more concerned not with where it happened but with where that member is allowed to continue to operate ( remember it stared here! ).
Just my opinion but for the greater good is my thinking. We wouldnt allow molesters or murderers etc to sleep over our home simply because there offense wasn't at our house. Drastic comparison I know but just making a point.