Membership is FREE – with unlimited access to all features, tools, and discussions. Premium accounts get benefits like banner ads and newsletter exposure. ✅ Signature links are now free for all. 🚫 No AI-generated (LLM) posts allowed. Share your own thoughts and experience — accounts may be terminated for violations.

Are your "Uniques" showing at Sedo?

HelmutsHelmuts is verified member.

Domain Summit | HostMaria
DNF Staff
DNForum.club
Registrar
Hosting Provider
Joined
Mar 29, 2014
Messages
1,908
Reaction score
722
are your @Sedo "Uniques" working? .. or, are just my Sedo listed names shit? :) .. @Sedo, or, is it something else - not unique lander views? Thank you

chrome_bYTdZnt82X.webp


and when I check the lander:
brave_c63FGA3LO8.webp


.. in this case, Elycia is a first name, also a name used in a few French company nd brand names + and a possible brand protection misstype domain for businesses like Elysia Paris (5-star hotel):
chrome_wRdmsEP6kA.webp
 

HelmutsHelmuts is verified member.

Domain Summit | HostMaria
DNF Staff
DNForum.club
Registrar
Hosting Provider
Joined
Mar 29, 2014
Messages
1,908
Reaction score
722

Ricado

Level 4
The Originals
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2004
Messages
111
Reaction score
12
I can share a recent real-world comparison that may help frame this.

I parked one domain at Sedo for about a week purely as a test. No clicks, which is fine, but the surprising part was that views / uniques stayed at 0 the entire time.

Later, with the help of a simple custom landing page, I added a basic “Contact Us” form to the page. No ads, no SEO work.
Within just a few days, it received 20+ inquiries. Some of them were spam, but honestly, that was the first time I was happy to see spam, because it confirmed the domain actually had incoming traffic.

Looking at Azure server logs, total requests over seven days (in reality closer to five days) exceeded 2,000 requests.

What’s interesting is that the .net version of this domain is actively developed and live, yet when the .com was parked at Sedo, uniques still showed 0.

This leads me to believe two things are happening:

1. Sedo “Uniques” are not raw visits, they are filtered, value-qualified views.
Sedo (and other parking platforms) aggressively filter traffic at multiple layers: bots, low-intent visits, short sessions, VPN/proxy traffic, and even borderline human visits that don’t meet internal quality thresholds.

If traffic doesn’t qualify for ad inventory or monetization logic, it simply never becomes a “unique” in the stats.

So a zero does not necessarily mean zero DNS or server-level requests; it means zero counted value visits.


2. First names, even legitimate ones, rarely generate natural brand traffic by default.
Even commonly used first names usually don’t produce organic navigation traffic unless they are already attached to a very visible brand, product, or media presence.

I have an even stronger example: I own a dropped domain that previously belonged to a restaurant that is still operating today.
Google Business still shows that exact domain in its listing.
Despite that, when parked, Sedo uniques were still 0.


So in cases like Elycia, the question may not be whether Sedo uniques are broken, but whether:
  • There is actual human navigation intent today
  • That intent survives Sedo’s traffic and ad-quality filtering

From my experience, parking stats today are more a reflection of monetizable intent, not raw visibility.
If you want to measure real interest, a minimal landing page with analytics or server logs provides a much clearer signal than parking uniques alone.
 
Top Bottom