closed Aries.com

[denny007]

Music, download p2p traffic is very valuable. Pays very good.

Would love to know where, what keyword. Those are people looking for pirated, free downloads. I have a lot of warez/torrent traffic and am happy for RPM $4-$5

 

[DomainTurn.com]

At first glance the name was something special

after the results

well I feel the name is misleading and can't project my feelings within

I don't like to mislead values as i did in this. It does take some quailty

domainer's such as all of you to realize true traffic and where it might

come from. That's why it's good to post a name for the value so the

researcher's can break down all the possiblities. I have learned a valuabe

lesson here. An old saying that hold's true here...

Never judge a book by it's cover, In the case never judge a domain name by

it's typein's

thanks

GeorgeK

nametower

denny007

For bringing the light

dt

 

[URLtrader]

Mid to high $$$$$. Goodluck.

URL Trader

 

[NameRegistration]

Same word in Spanish (probably in more languages too). High $XX,XXX IMO.

 

[MJM]

Music, download p2p traffic is very valuable. Pays very good.

Would love to know where, what keyword. Those are people looking for pirated, free downloads. I have a lot of warez/torrent traffic and am happy for RPM $4-$5

Don't assume everything is on a CPC (keyword) basis for maximized profit.

In this particular instance (and many markets for that matter), p2p traffic performs exceptionally well with CPA-driven campaigns, for "free music downloads" sites. The sites that promise millions of songs to download, legally. Yet when you join/pay membership, it only details how file sharing programs work/and where to download them. Basically paying 30 bucks for an easy-to-find guide.

Go to clickbank.com, you will see several sponsor sites, offering programs for webmasters. Although, I will say - They're shunned upon, and thought of as unethical amongst the p2p community. As unsuspecting newbies/visitors, convert well - but only do to very misleading wording, etc.



Regarding the domain: With the traffic bleed, hard to appraise without revenue stats (nor am I asking for them), thus it's complicated to assess this domains worth. As 8000 daily visitors surely skews it's long term value. Nice name nevertheless. To avoid being obscure, for the record - I'd say Low five with no apparent 'high' traffic, solely on it's intrinsic merits.