dwrixon wrote:
China is the world's largest recepient of inward investment and most comes from the USA which is hermoraging jobs due to lack of domestic investment. If you think large US internationals are doing this purely on humanitarian grounds, then I am afraid that I have to question the validity of your analysis.
+++++++++++++++++++++++
OK, so maybe the US is losing some jobs.
So what? What KIND of jobs is more the issue.
The former US employees don't automatically die when their low paying jobs go overseas, they simply become unemployed --and theoretically available for higher skilled and better paying jobs.
I am sorry, but if you think that the plight of the dollar has no bearing on the short to medium term prospects of US dollar, then you are living in dreamland. However, you are correct in not pointing the blame at the companies that are innovating by outsourcing. The real blame lies in the government, that has amassed huge debts and allowed the consumer too much disposable income in relation to the US productivity which in many instances is probably illusory.
My argument, however, was to counteract the arguement that any investment in China was effectively pouring money down the sink. Yes, there are risks, but clearly most large multinationals are prepared to take those risks. I think the clear message is that the scale of the potential profits is regarded as very interesting indeed.
Regards
Dave Wrixon
Business cost is driven down, enabling more investment. Resources are liberated for higher and better uses.
Outsourcing and export of low paying jobs is a good thing.