For Sale eNom Gets Two Biggies Today

[HLK]

searchforhomes.com & kidsgames.com

 

[Togoodhlth]

They got a TON of names today!
NW didn't do so bad either.

 

[think]

Originally posted by HLK
searchforhomes.com & kidsgames.com

Where are you getting these results from?

 

[HLK]

enom whois

 

[think]

Ahh, Thank you

 

[HLK]

That was kidsfun.com

 

[Chad]

>>kidsfun.com

Sweet

 

[Attilio]

I confirm they got searchforhomes.com

 

[actnow]

NW got TeacherStore.com today for $1,112. for someone.
The price went from 100 to 1,000 the last hour.

I ended up with 4 cheapies at NW. For some reason, NW is not getting a lot of the higher price names. Maybe, Enom and GoDaddy are pushing harder.

 

[spietreser]

Ah... does GoDaddy work with other registrars as well?

 

[clemzonguy]

Hey ENOM if you hear me... please give us an auction system!!

 

[TheBansche]

So the verdict? Is enom worth trying?

You know, someone with experience in My SLQ should put some tables together that join the pending delete lists by registrar for a trailing 7 day period with the new registrations registrations by registrar and try to create a benchmark to determine catch success rates. I'd do it myself if I knew anything about my SQL and had the time. Wouldn't this be an awesome benchmark? Anyone know any bored, genious college kids who have the time and expertise to do this?

 

[Steen]

Originally posted by spietreser
Ah... does GoDaddy work with other registrars as well?

No, not htat I know of.

 

[_Yakov_]

Originally posted by clemzonguy
Hey ENOM if you hear me... please give us an auction system!!

Nonsense. Man, do you bid on Namewinner? If not, then why do you need the auction system? If yes, then aren't namewinner, thefirstname and dropking enough for you? Don't see any point, unfortunately.

 

[clemzonguy]

Don't see any point, unfortunately.

Too much of a wildcard on low end names that namewinner and others don't go after frankly. I would rather know I received the name by paying at least $25-$45. Enom should allow bidding in the event where two or more people are going after the same name but not give any more priority to the name than any other. Maybe that would help out and generate more revenue for them at the same time.

 

[DomainGoon]

Originally posted by clemzonguy


Too much of a wildcard on low end names that namewinner and others don't go after frankly. I would rather know I received the name by paying at least $25-$45. Enom should allow bidding in the event where two or more people are going after the same name but not give any more priority to the name than any other. Maybe that would help out and generate more revenue for them at the same time.

Enom is fine the way it is. Why have every system be the same?

 

[mohno]

I watched 527 domains which had SnapBacks yesterday.
NameWinner got 186 domains (35%!!) besides domains without SnapBacks, e.g., TeacherStore.com/$1,112(BuyDomains), Characters.net/$507(BuyDomains), USJobSearch.com/$301(ULT) and so on.
The bid amount of success domains is over $9000.

And I lost 2 Snapped domains to NameWinner. :sad:

By the way, I found BuyDomains got broadhurst.com with eNom ...

 

[.com.net.org]

Originally posted by TheBansche
So the verdict? Is enom worth trying?

You know, someone with experience in My SLQ should put some tables together that join the pending delete lists by registrar for a trailing 7 day period with the new registrations registrations by registrar and try to create a benchmark to determine catch success rates. I'd do it myself if I knew anything about my SQL and had the time. Wouldn't this be an awesome benchmark? Anyone know any bored, genious college kids who have the time and expertise to do this?

If you have the data, I can do the query.

 

[clemzonguy]

If you have the data, I can do the query.

Just take the pending delete lists

 

[stuff]

I did only get servicelive.com