• Welcome to DNForum.com - Domain Investor Forum, Free Domain Marketplace and a community for 45+ domain pros
    If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the oldest global domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 45,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, using our free in-house built tools, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.

guess how much PHOTOSHOP.CO.UK went for!

Status
Not open for further replies.
what I was saying was I'd make profit while I could and when adobe was coming to my door I would hand domain over to them (no legal battle or expensive fees.) I would give it to them at the price that I would have bought it and they would agree because 850 is a lot less then what their lawyers charge them.

Meanwhile I'd keep any money that I earned prior to adobe recapturing domain
 
That's like saying it's ok to sell drugs until you're caught. Then you hand the drugs over and keep whatever profit you made.
 
slavahosting said:
what I was saying was I'd make profit while I could and when adobe was coming to my door I would hand domain over to them (no legal battle or expensive fees.) I would give it to them at the price that I would have bought it and they would agree because 850 is a lot less then what their lawyers charge them.

Meanwhile I'd keep any money that I earned prior to adobe recapturing domain


I think that word you had asked about was "naive" .

Have a good 4th of July...
 
slavahosting said:
I would give it to them at the price that I would have bought it and they would agree because 850 is a lot less then what their lawyers charge them.

Big corps don't work like that. They would pay thousands on legal fees to protect their TM and get the domains they think they are entitled to. They do not bargain and pay the allegedly infringing party.
 
RADiSTAR said:
Adobe is known to aggressively defend their trademarks. I guess the buyer had 850 BP to waste; the seller was obviously smarter.

Wrong! Unlike seller, buyer knew exactly he was doing.

That was a great buy.

www.thephotoshoponline.co.uk
 
sasquatch said:
Wrong! Unlike seller, buyer knew exactly he was doing.

That was a great buy.

www.thephotoshoponline.co.uk

As I said..if there was a legitmate use for it..there was probably not
an issue...but in most cases of domains like this they are purchased
to capitalize off the TM product/domain. If this was the buyer I think
they got a great deal and it should serve them well. They have a valid
defense of their usage...that is not to say that if Adobe is feeling
fiesty they won't try to go after it...they just stand a much lesser chance
of winning.


Have a good holiday...
 
Hopefully they make their profit before the name is taken away.
There are some bets many here do not feel is worth their time.
Mr.Deleted, NAPA is great. They put out a Photoshop Magazine and partner with Adobe on promoting the product. They're NOT going to be located at a domain name like this one, if that's what you're suggesting. Adobe would secure this name for the company, not to disfuse its branding by letting a partner be confused with the official company. Doesn't make a lick of sense.

With a PPC page up, the owner is not looking to win any points on skirting the TM issue.

~ Nexus
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom