Hi all, I’ve been comparing two domains recently — one .com and one .ai — for the same project, and it made me rethink how we usually judge domains. A lot of the discussion ends up being about which extension is better, but that feels like the wrong starting point. Some domains make more sense as resale assets, while others are better suited as build-first or operating domains. When both are judged using the same criteria, decisions can get distorted. I’m curious how others here think about this — do you evaluate build-first domains differently from resale domains? When looking at .ai names, what makes one worth building on versus skipping? And have you ever chosen the “right” extension but later felt it was the wrong domain for the job? Just interested in hearing different perspectives.
Membership is FREE – with unlimited access to all features, tools, and discussions. Premium accounts get benefits like banner ads and newsletter exposure. ✅ Signature links are now free for all. 🚫 No AI-generated (LLM) posts allowed. Share your own thoughts and experience — accounts may be terminated for violations.
discussion How do you judge .com vs .ai for real projects?
- Thread starter Hashim
- Start date
This is a general discussion thread revolving around the a topic of the original poster's choice.
Premiumdomains12
Level 2
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2025
- Messages
- 22
- Reaction score
- 0
.COM i think Best
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2004
- Messages
- 4,413
- Reaction score
- 690
If you get the odd extension, try to also get the .com and forward it to that website.
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2024
- Messages
- 388
- Reaction score
- 149
Hi Hashim,
That’s a good distinction to surface. In practice, I think many people mix two different evaluations without realizing it. A resale domain is judged on liquidity, buyer pool, and price discovery, while a build-first domain is judged on clarity, intent fit, and how well it reduces friction for users and partners.
With .ai in particular, I tend to ask a different question than “will this resell?” I ask whether the name can carry operational meaning once the product exists. Some .ai names work because they describe a function or capability and make onboarding easier. Others look great on a sales page but fall apart once you imagine customer support, compliance, or long-term positioning.
I’ve definitely seen cases where the extension choice was “right,” but the domain itself didn’t age well once the business evolved. That’s usually a signal that the name was optimized for signaling rather than for actual use.
That’s a good distinction to surface. In practice, I think many people mix two different evaluations without realizing it. A resale domain is judged on liquidity, buyer pool, and price discovery, while a build-first domain is judged on clarity, intent fit, and how well it reduces friction for users and partners.
With .ai in particular, I tend to ask a different question than “will this resell?” I ask whether the name can carry operational meaning once the product exists. Some .ai names work because they describe a function or capability and make onboarding easier. Others look great on a sales page but fall apart once you imagine customer support, compliance, or long-term positioning.
I’ve definitely seen cases where the extension choice was “right,” but the domain itself didn’t age well once the business evolved. That’s usually a signal that the name was optimized for signaling rather than for actual use.
