- Joined
- Dec 31, 2006
- Messages
- 4,688
- Reaction score
- 168
A few interesting things in here, came in this morning:
http://www.webceo.com/newsletter/150109.html
http://www.webceo.com/newsletter/150109.html
I understand the value of the keywords at the top of Google, depends directly on the amount of potential traffic that they are able to bring in from real search engine users. Of course other factors come into play also, including the amount of money that could be made from the website that is listed in the first place position.
The value of this type of search engine exposure depends on what you are able to do with it once the results that you desire, once they have been successfully achieved.
The value will definitely have more potential worth to someone that had a very good use for it.
When many websites are trying to complete for the same keywords, it would seemingly increase the value of the keywords, because more websites are competing to be listed at the top of the search engine.
That is, I guess, why I am so confused.all of what you say, we already know
as a "claimed" seo expert, please state something we don't know
and also, there is no need to continue to link to google, yahoo and msn...we all know how to find them.
thanks
That's exactly my point.nice thread.
I think we all agree that a #1 position on google is only worth something if you are getting traffic from that position. You have to use the right keywords. The more competitive those keywords, the harder it will be to get a #1 position.
You will not get a lot of visitors to your site if you are going to optimise for keywords 'Pina Colada Siberia' even if it ranks #1 at the same time in G. Because no one is using this search term.
Anyone would be super impressed if someone come and say "I have #1 position for "mortgage" on Google".![]()
Worth quoting.To understand the hidden and the most expenive blue print ( to my opinion - the google algorithm after mona-lisa painting), it works on many elements which can never be written and explianed easily.
Their ranking depends on the
1) content - about (all w's & h's what who whom where etc), geo aspects, duplicates, relative content etc..
2) meta tags - depending on the content, servers, locations , tags, indexed pages
3) SEO strategies - links, backlinks, external/internal, their quality/quanity, no ffa, linked site categories effecting PPC and revenue generation
These are just the very few TO BEGIN WITH, it will take all night but will be difficult to get to the point -> Good night.
2)
Don't leave us hanging - gotta link?Thanks for the tip doc.
There's also a book available "SEO made easy" by Brad Callen. Its available as a free download across the internet and tackles the issues discussed in this topic, a must read imho.
How about #1 ...out of 483,000,000 search results ...with NO QUOTES!
( or 2nd out of 18,000,000 or 45,000,000 or...)
I have a domain at Parked.com that was #4 on Google last week for a nice keyword phrase (& was starting to generate decent revenue) ... but it's not even in the top 100 now. Oh, well - easy come, easy go.
Now it's back at #4 again - don't know why, but I'm not complaining. ($3 in clicks so far today.) Easy go, easy come back!![]()
when parking, you have no control over backlinks.Could it be that you don't have strong backlinks? Without those SERP can fluctuate a bit.
*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators