Forums
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Market
Domains/Websites Wanted
.com Domain Market
gTLD Domain Market
ccTLD Domain Market
Web3 Domain Market
Third-Level Domain Market
Adult Domain Market
What's New
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Account Upgrade
Premium Members Directory
Log in
Register
What's New
calendar
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Enjoy unlimited access to all forum features for FREE! Optional upgrade available for extra perks.
Forums
Domain Discussion
Domain Name Legal Issues
NAMEJET.com ~WARNING~ Disgusting behaviour!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TheLegendaryJP" data-source="post: 1552885" data-attributes="member: 63897"><p>See that right now is a moot point because, even if a tm name it does not negate namejets actions, if not a tm it goes without saying the winner is now having to defend his purchase. Clearly not coincidently this name was auctioned, it was done to avoid an issue with a complaintant and cash in while they could. I have heard this tale from 3 others today alone. The actions of the winning bidder is secondary imo, if they are served a wipo/udrp/c&d etc after winning a name that is part of the cost of business they take on and knowingly so. It is another issue when a auction company auctions of the name they KNOW will face a notice.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TheLegendaryJP, post: 1552885, member: 63897"] See that right now is a moot point because, even if a tm name it does not negate namejets actions, if not a tm it goes without saying the winner is now having to defend his purchase. Clearly not coincidently this name was auctioned, it was done to avoid an issue with a complaintant and cash in while they could. I have heard this tale from 3 others today alone. The actions of the winning bidder is secondary imo, if they are served a wipo/udrp/c&d etc after winning a name that is part of the cost of business they take on and knowingly so. It is another issue when a auction company auctions of the name they KNOW will face a notice. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Domain Discussion
Domain Name Legal Issues
NAMEJET.com ~WARNING~ Disgusting behaviour!
Top
Bottom