Forums
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Market
Domains/Websites Wanted
.com Domain Market
gTLD Domain Market
ccTLD Domain Market
Web3 Domain Market
Third-Level Domain Market
Adult Domain Market
What's New
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Account Upgrade
Premium Members Directory
Log in
Register
What's New
calendar
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Enjoy unlimited access to all forum features for FREE! Optional upgrade available for extra perks.
Forums
Domain Discussion
Domain Name Legal Issues
NAMEJET.com ~WARNING~ Disgusting behaviour!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TheLegendaryJP" data-source="post: 1553193" data-attributes="member: 63897"><p>Ron, this is the closest to the current situation as you can get. Yes the udrp came in the winning bidders name and yes there was obvious unethical actions ( the auction ) taken by namejet. What the winning bidder is further trying to uncover is what exactly namejet was notified of, be it a warning of action to commence or a literal notice he is unsure atm. </p><p></p><p>The most telling is the exhibit in the current udrp which shows their LAST communication was 8/29 with namejet and the fact the auction started immediately and ended 8/31 ! It doesnt get clearer than a quick dump by namejet as that.:sigh2: If the complaintant did not mention namejet ( which obviously must be of importance to their case to mention ) the winning bidder would have been non the wiser. This is the first time I have seen this and wonder how many other times Namejet knows or " senses " a tm holder will persue a name and quickly dumps it.</p><p></p><p>IMO and wothout knowning yet my personal guess is Namejet was notified by email that some action would be taken and decided to dump the name, otherwise this is just a HUGE coincidence. I mean they made a decision to dump the name the SAME day as getting an email from the eventual complaitant. And not the first but LAST email according to exhibit in udrp.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TheLegendaryJP, post: 1553193, member: 63897"] Ron, this is the closest to the current situation as you can get. Yes the udrp came in the winning bidders name and yes there was obvious unethical actions ( the auction ) taken by namejet. What the winning bidder is further trying to uncover is what exactly namejet was notified of, be it a warning of action to commence or a literal notice he is unsure atm. The most telling is the exhibit in the current udrp which shows their LAST communication was 8/29 with namejet and the fact the auction started immediately and ended 8/31 ! It doesnt get clearer than a quick dump by namejet as that.:sigh2: If the complaintant did not mention namejet ( which obviously must be of importance to their case to mention ) the winning bidder would have been non the wiser. This is the first time I have seen this and wonder how many other times Namejet knows or " senses " a tm holder will persue a name and quickly dumps it. IMO and wothout knowning yet my personal guess is Namejet was notified by email that some action would be taken and decided to dump the name, otherwise this is just a HUGE coincidence. I mean they made a decision to dump the name the SAME day as getting an email from the eventual complaitant. And not the first but LAST email according to exhibit in udrp. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Domain Discussion
Domain Name Legal Issues
NAMEJET.com ~WARNING~ Disgusting behaviour!
Top
Bottom