Nic, right now Iââ¬â¢m ambivalent on the whole WLS issue as Iââ¬â¢m rapidly losing interest in drops because Iââ¬â¢ve finally realized ââ¬â and this is a personal view - the returns donââ¬â¢t match the investment of time needed to catch good names. Iââ¬â¢d rather spend that time developing revenue-generating websites, as each hour spent in this pursuit will have a return to show for it.
Iââ¬â¢ve got eight SnapBacks left, two of which are simply protecting my own names. If the WLS proceeds and SnapNames is fast enough to secure WLSââ¬â¢s on most of them, Iââ¬â¢ll probably score two maybe three very good names as they currently donââ¬â¢t resolve and their owners arenââ¬â¢t likely to renew.
But if the WLS is given the thumbs down by ICANN, Iââ¬â¢ve then got to contend with BD, Ult and the rest of you ââ¬â well, those who are on the ball anyway ;^) - at drop time, and so Iââ¬â¢ll get maybe only one of the good names.
My chances are obviously better with the WLS, but from a standpoint of fair competition, I would prefer not to see the WLS proceed.