Membership is FREE – with unlimited access to all features, tools, and discussions. Premium accounts get benefits like banner ads and newsletter exposure. ✅ Signature links are now free for all. 🚫 No AI-generated (LLM) posts allowed. Share your own thoughts and experience — accounts may be terminated for violations.
Idiom does not always follow strict logic. That's why many whose English is a second language (I'm not saying that's you), make poor choices in domain regs.
Anytime you step outside of single words, you have to be careful you are following idiom...if you want to make a profit.
Because newlywed is a commonly accepted word in the English language - newlyborn is not. English has many idiosyncracies like that. You have to go with what is in common usage. Just because you think it would make sense to say newlyborn doesn't mean millions of people will start using that term when they have never used it before.
Yes i do agree newborn is also used....but here is some scientific stuffs published from the US.....not sure which one is more correct logically!!! google opens 50,000 links with this phrase....
Originally posted by drbiohealth Yes i do agree newborn is also used....but here is some scientific stuffs published from the US.....not sure which one is more correct logically!!! google opens 50,000 links with this phrase....
And google opens close to 1,000,000 with "newborn."
While the phrase "newly born" has some usage, the word newlyborn doesn't exist. Idiomatically, the word "newborn" will most often be used, instead of the phrase "newly born."
Further, this is one case where the tendency of URL phrase to be unparsed works against you, because someone reading the "word" newlyborn will associate with the common "newborn," resulting possibly in either incorrect recall, or a misperception of error.