Membership is FREE – with unlimited access to all features, tools, and discussions. Premium accounts get benefits like banner ads and newsletter exposure. ✅ Signature links are now free for all. 🚫 No AI-generated (LLM) posts allowed. Share your own thoughts and experience — accounts may be terminated for violations.

Ohio Attorney General Orders Domains Taken

Status
Not open for further replies.

DomainGoon

New Member
The Originals
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2002
Messages
219
Reaction score
0
Internet Domain Names for State Senators No Longer For Sale
by Dan Weist, Ohio News Network

January 24, 2003

The domain names for 9 Ohio State Senators aren’t for sale anymore, at least for the moment.

Mark Gribben of the State Attorney General’s office says it’s not legal to use someone’s name without permission.

Attorney General Jim Petro issued the order Thursday that Stamper relinquish the internet domains using the senators’ names.

http://www.onnnews.com/story.php?record=21764

Jeremy Stamper has so far ignored the warnings from Ohio Attorney General Jim Petro's office that he is violating federal law by registering Web domain names and trying to sell them.

Mumper and other senators met Tuesday with Petro, who in an e-mail to Stamper informed him that he is breaking the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act signed into law in 1999. Petro said in the letter that the law requires consent prior to the registration and sale of an individual's name as a domain name.

http://www.marionstar.com/news/stories/20030123/localnews/837505.html

These people are public figures, but he did list the domains on eBay. I wonder what power the AG has to take domains from people, withut a court case, under the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act?
 

Drewbert

New Member
The Originals
Legacy Gold Member
Joined
May 6, 2002
Messages
480
Reaction score
10
>Attorney General Jim Petro issued the order
>Thursday that Stamper relinquish the internet
>domains using the senators’ names.

I didn't realise Ohio had become a fascist regime. When did that happen?
 

charles

New Member
The Originals
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2003
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
The second article above contains this

Kim Norris, spokeswoman for the attorney general's office, said ..."We're discussing further legal action against Stamper," Norris said. "We don't have his exact address, so we can't serve him."

As we all know, this means they can commence an ACPA action in the Eastern District of Virginia, and commence an In Rem action against the names. Bad venue for Stamper, since the EDVA was the birthplace of the "domain names are not property" fallacy, the home base of VeriSign, and also incidentally a place where African-Americans were property for over a hundred years. Mr. Stamper is African-American, so the fact may seem relevant, although I would never suggest in a thousand years that any vestige of anti-African-American sentiment remains anywhere in the State of Virginia. (I went to military school in VA as a kid, and have fond memories about the total atmosphere of racial harmony that existed among the other cadets. Not!)

Ciao,
Chas
 

cluelessdomainer

New Member
The Originals
Legacy Gold Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2002
Messages
153
Reaction score
0
charles, that is good, but your legal caveat is a little distracting.
 

pljones

New Member
The Originals
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2002
Messages
170
Reaction score
0
Well, the Ohio AG could file a false contact report with Tucows, requesting that the Whois information be updated with accurate contact information for Stamper. Tucows has to place the registrant on notice of the false contact report, and give Stamper 15 days to correct the info before the domain names are deleted.

At the same time, the AG's office can also contact the Hotmail Abuse Department and have Stamper's e-mail address revoked.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom