political Politics

[JennBlogger]

That's what I thought.

See you on the flipside. There's really nothing we can come to middle ground on.

haha, so you run away after asking a completely ridiculous question that had nothing to do with the topic. And then, I answered it.

Go ahead and answer my other ON TOPIC post. You skipped it.

 

[amplify]

There's no running away. I'm walking out of a scenario where I cannot change your mind and you cannot change mine. I agree white supremacist organizations should be on terror lists as much as I now believe Anonymous should.

This directly relates to my opinion about the left having only empathy when it serves their purpose. You do not care about any person or anybody else's property unless it fits your agenda.

We can't agree anywhere so why waste my time going in circles?

 

[JennBlogger]

There's no running away. I'm walking out of a scenario where I cannot change your mind and you cannot change mine. I agree white supremacist organizations should be on terror lists as much as I now believe Anonymous should.

This directly relates to my opinion about the left having only empathy when it serves their purpose. You do not care about any person or anybody else's property unless it fits your agenda.

We can't agree anywhere so why waste my time going in circles?

Again:

Which group is more outspoken against wearing masks and vaccines?
A. Those leaning left
B. Those leaning right.

Let's imagine 1 state and 2 different scenarios:
A. Every single person wearing a mask and getting a vaccine.
B. Nobody wearing a mask, nobody getting a vaccine.

Which scenario A or B would you imagine there would be more Covid sickness and death.

 

[amplify]

Which scenario A or B would you imagine there would be more Covid sickness and death.

Explain to me New York and Florida then.

 

[JennBlogger]

I agree white supremacist organizations should be on terror lists as much as I now believe Anonymous should.

Who do you think Anonymous targets? The type of people/sites you think should be on terror lists.

 

[JennBlogger]

Explain to me New York and Florida then.

You're trying to dodge the question, it's simple A or B:

Which group is more outspoken against wearing masks and vaccines?
A. Those leaning left
B. Those leaning right.

Let's imagine 1 state and 2 different scenarios:
A. Every single person wearing a mask and getting a vaccine.
B. Nobody wearing a mask, nobody getting a vaccine.

Which scenario A or B would you imagine there would be more Covid sickness and death.

What about New York of Florida? There is not 1 state that is all or nothing.

Now tackle my 2 questions. It literally can be a 2 letter response. Like

A
B

or

B
B

etc

 

[amplify]

What about New York of Florida? There is not 1 state that is all or nothing.

You know the way they handled it was vastly different.

Florida had 1 million more infections but only 4000 or so more deaths? Seems like if no vax/mask was as large of a threat as you say it is, it should follow New York and have a minimum of 80,000 deaths.

And you still can't understand that terrorism can't fight terrorism... We have a justice system in place to achieve anything that Anonymous did. Yet, you give them a pass.

 

[JennBlogger]

You know the way they handled it was vastly different.

Florida had 1 million more infections but only 4000 or so more deaths? Seems like if no vax/mask was as large of a threat as you say it is, it should follow New York and have a minimum of 80,000 deaths.

And you still can't understand that terrorism can't fight terrorism... We have a justice system in place to achieve anything that Anonymous did. Yet, you give them a pass.

Dodged it again:

Which group is more outspoken against wearing masks and vaccines?
A. Those leaning left
B. Those leaning right.

Let's imagine 1 state and 2 different scenarios:
A. Every single person wearing a mask and getting a vaccine.
B. Nobody wearing a mask, nobody getting a vaccine.

Which scenario A or B would you imagine there would be more Covid sickness and death.

-------------
You're dodging it because we both know you can't answer those questions honestly because in doing so, you would be proving my point.

That's why you are running as fast as you can from answering 2 simple questions. I'm not asking for you to write a book, it's a simple A or B. Tried to make it simple as possible, and you still run.

 

[JennBlogger]

And btw Florida is #8 in both cases and deaths per million.

And most of those deaths are unvaccinated.

You again, are proving my point.

 

[amplify]

B and in hindsight B with herd immunity.

Now answer my questions.

Edit: Read your post wrong, hold on.

 

[JennBlogger]

B and in hindsight B with herd immunity.

Now answer my questions.

Edit: Read your post wrong, hold on.

Thanks for proving me right that those on the right are extending the pandemic, causing more sickness and death, and further hurting our economy.

And I did answer your question in my last post. You are aware that just because Florida or any other state that has a dumb governor, doesn't mean everybody follows them? Most people still wore masks and got vaccines.

 

[amplify]

Which scenario A or B would you imagine there would be more Covid sickness and death.

Read your post wrong, disregard my answering above. You tied Covid sickness and death together. Those are two separate issues. In hindsight, we would've had more Covid sicknesses, by far, but probably a statistic phenomenon of fewer deaths in hindsight if we went with herd immunity and allowed doctors the ability to treat it how they saw fit using viral therapeutics already available.

 

[JennBlogger]

Read your post wrong, disregard my answering above. You tied Covid sickness and death together. Those are two separate issues. In hindsight, we would've had more Covid sicknesses, by far, but probably a statistic phenomenon of fewer deaths in hindsight if we went with herd immunity.

That's completely nuts.

You're saying
A. Every single person wearing a mask and getting a vaccine.
B. Nobody wearing a mask, nobody getting a vaccine.

That we would have fewer deaths in.......B? lol that's nuts

 

[amplify]

That we would have fewer deaths in.......B? lol that's nuts

The ratio, yes.

But as I've answered your questions, and you still won't entertain me by answering mine, I'mma see my way out as this seems more like a 1-sided conversation.

 

[JennBlogger]

The ratio, yes.

But as I've answered your questions, and you still won't entertain me by answering mine, I'mma see my way out as this seems more like a 1-sided conversation.

You're seeing your way out of it because you are posting some truly ridiculous stuff that doesn't hold up to reality. You could never win a Covid debate with the nonsense you've been posting.

Let's do nothing and all get Covid is both lazy and irresponsible and the situation would be even worse than it is now. We would have much more death.

 

[amplify]

Alright, you win @JennBlogger.

I will bow out of this conversation because you can't seem to have a two-way give and take discussion.

 

[JennBlogger]

Alright, you win @JennBlogger.

I will bow out of this conversation because you can't seem to have a two-way give and take discussion.

There is no 2 way on this issue.

We would have less death with wearing masks and vaccines. It's not debatable.

 

[amplify]

There is no 2 way on this issue.

Unless you want to discuss other topics I have brought up, I'll bow out.

 

[aleksey.k]

Can you give details on the plan?

Most of what's happening is due to the pandemic, which those on the right are extending by not following COVID guidelines. They are hell bent on destroying America to get back at Biden and because their here Trump lost big time.

It's a meme flu with a 98% survival rate. If it wasn't for The Government that overreacted to the (((issue))) there would be no crisis at all.

The plan is simple: permanent hysteria about (((the flu))), booster shots every 6 months to enforce coherence amongst the sheep, blaming far-right and unvaxxed about causing mutations (like viruses don't mutate naturally);
permanent lockdowns due to the assumed mutations will cause a crisis (we're here);
A crisis will be used as a justification for social-economical shifts which will eliminate some easy-replaceable jobs and this will essentially put people working in these spheres into dependence on The Government (no vax -- no relief bucks). (((They))) will also try to eliminate fiat currencies and private property -- exactly as described by Shwab and WEF.

TLDR: (((Communists))) are still in their attempt to enslave the population, remove all freedoms, fiat money & private property.

 

[JennBlogger]

It's a meme flu with a 98% survival rate. If it wasn't for The Government that overreacted to the (((issue))) there would be no crisis at all.

The plan is simple: permanent hysteria about (((the flu))), booster shots every 6 months to enforce coherence amongst the sheep, blaming far-right and unvaxxed about causing mutations (like viruses don't mutate naturally);
permanent lockdowns due to the assumed mutations will cause a crisis (we're here);
A crisis will be used as a justification for social-economical shifts which will eliminate some easy-replaceable jobs and this will essentially put people working in these spheres into dependence on The Government (no vax -- no relief bucks). (((They))) will also try to eliminate fiat currencies and private property -- exactly as described by Shwab and WEF.

TLDR: (((Communists))) are still in their attempt to enslave the population, remove all freedoms, fiat money & private property.

As expected, it doesn't really seem you're cemented in reality.

The survival rate is helped with vaccination. Most that are dying from Covid are unvaccinated.

People keep mentioning survival rate but always leave out over 5 million dead. If you're alive and your friends and family are alive, I guess it doesn't matter to you. Those that died and their family and friends, I'm sure feel differently. Or those that died for other reasons when the ICU beds were filled with Covid patients.

Permanent hysteria makes no sense. One side is trying to handle it, the other side (like you) doesn't care. See above.

What permanent lockdowns? Areas that are vaxxed, wearing masks, following guidelines will have less occurrence of Covid and stay open. Areas where it's out of control would get locked down. Again, following your path, it would be out of control locked down. Which makes it seem it's more what you want, lockdowns.

And then you mentioned Communist for one last giggle.