- Joined
- Apr 13, 2003
- Messages
- 274
- Reaction score
- 1
Here is my take on the whole scenerio in a nut shell.
Snapnames dropped the ball on the RRP name grabbing deal while Pool.com came in and dominated the market. Snapnames wanted to maintain a relationship with NSI so they did nothing for more than a year waiting on WLS until NSI heard that Tucows was going to auction off expired names before they were sent into redemption period. NSI knew they wanted to do this for a long time and once they heard Tucows plan they decided the time was now. NSI activated their partnership with Snapnames to copy Tucows in auctioning pre-RGP domains (which they are doing now). ICANN, Pool and a bunch of others are freaking out and launching lawsuits. Now Pool is doing what NSI is doing and what Tucows has announced they will do but with slightly different terms.
The long version is much more complicated (and interesting) but I won't bore you with the details.
Snapnames dropped the ball on the RRP name grabbing deal while Pool.com came in and dominated the market. Snapnames wanted to maintain a relationship with NSI so they did nothing for more than a year waiting on WLS until NSI heard that Tucows was going to auction off expired names before they were sent into redemption period. NSI knew they wanted to do this for a long time and once they heard Tucows plan they decided the time was now. NSI activated their partnership with Snapnames to copy Tucows in auctioning pre-RGP domains (which they are doing now). ICANN, Pool and a bunch of others are freaking out and launching lawsuits. Now Pool is doing what NSI is doing and what Tucows has announced they will do but with slightly different terms.
The long version is much more complicated (and interesting) but I won't bore you with the details.