Membership is FREE – with unlimited access to all features, tools, and discussions. Premium accounts get benefits like banner ads and newsletter exposure. ✅ Signature links are now free for all. 🚫 No AI-generated (LLM) posts allowed. Share your own thoughts and experience — accounts may be terminated for violations.
closed SeniorCitizens.org
- Thread starter quadnames
- Start date
This thread has been closed by the original author or DNF staff member.
- Status
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2003
- Messages
- 1,335
- Reaction score
- 0
We've already seen the market for .org's has been erupting a bit like a volcano, and this one, which definitely is a gem, goes extraordinarily well with the .org tld. Combine that with the "aging population" phenomenon in the US market, and your're looking at easily a $xx,xxx name. Low $x,xxx is way too low. Mid to high $x,xxx would be the "bargain" level for an end user, low would be quick flip bottom of the barrel pricing if you were inclined to sell.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2003
- Messages
- 1,335
- Reaction score
- 0
Cool - I didn't even know about this: http://seniors.org/.
I was just out for a bit, and while I was out I thought a little about this one because I'm no stranger to looking into a few "senior" domains myself. Anyway, even though I expect almost everybody would agree that the single word "seniors" is more desirable than "senior citizens," ironically the shorter version is a bit ambiguous, whereas the two worder is not. For instance, if I were a younger Web surfer, I'd be inclined to not necessarily be so sure right away whether it was for senior citizens, or maybe something for high school seniors, college seniors, or maybe some other clever use of the term beyond the more obvious choices, especially given the way things often work online. Nonetheless, despite this being a true gem I would still take seniors.org and seniors.com over the longer version if that were possible.
Hey, check this one out, too: http://senior.org/. They're "working for a responsible America for senior citizens since 1990" (bold added).
This domain definitely rocks in .org.
I was just out for a bit, and while I was out I thought a little about this one because I'm no stranger to looking into a few "senior" domains myself. Anyway, even though I expect almost everybody would agree that the single word "seniors" is more desirable than "senior citizens," ironically the shorter version is a bit ambiguous, whereas the two worder is not. For instance, if I were a younger Web surfer, I'd be inclined to not necessarily be so sure right away whether it was for senior citizens, or maybe something for high school seniors, college seniors, or maybe some other clever use of the term beyond the more obvious choices, especially given the way things often work online. Nonetheless, despite this being a true gem I would still take seniors.org and seniors.com over the longer version if that were possible.
Hey, check this one out, too: http://senior.org/. They're "working for a responsible America for senior citizens since 1990" (bold added).
This domain definitely rocks in .org.
Last edited:
- Status
