Hi guys,
Heres the story in short: There are two social networking sites, one german and one english. The english one is mine and is a .com which just launched today. The german one is a .org and has been around for a few months. Today, we got blogged about and we've had some comments and blog replies from german bloggers that we are "copycats" and clones, which really irritates me. My project is older, having being started ever since last year. I also acquired the .com before they registered their .org. However, the audience doesnt want to recognize that. They think that because the German site launched first, they own the brand. My site was under painfully slow development, so all we had was a "Coming soon, under development" page up.
So to be clear: - I acquired the .com before they regged their .org
- My idea was in development before theirs was
- They went public before we did, building a small name in the german web crowd
- Our ideas are pretty similar, but so are a lot of other ideas out there. In no way have I taken ideas or features from their site.
- They serve the german market in a german language site, I serve the north american market in english
So whose right here? I'm really pissed that German blogs are accusing me of being a "thief", copycat, clone, when the idea is original and was intiated way before their project was. Console me if you will. Thanks
Resolution: The german startup site is now renaming their project to avoid conflict with us. Yay!
Heres the story in short: There are two social networking sites, one german and one english. The english one is mine and is a .com which just launched today. The german one is a .org and has been around for a few months. Today, we got blogged about and we've had some comments and blog replies from german bloggers that we are "copycats" and clones, which really irritates me. My project is older, having being started ever since last year. I also acquired the .com before they registered their .org. However, the audience doesnt want to recognize that. They think that because the German site launched first, they own the brand. My site was under painfully slow development, so all we had was a "Coming soon, under development" page up.
So to be clear: - I acquired the .com before they regged their .org
- My idea was in development before theirs was
- They went public before we did, building a small name in the german web crowd
- Our ideas are pretty similar, but so are a lot of other ideas out there. In no way have I taken ideas or features from their site.
- They serve the german market in a german language site, I serve the north american market in english
So whose right here? I'm really pissed that German blogs are accusing me of being a "thief", copycat, clone, when the idea is original and was intiated way before their project was. Console me if you will. Thanks
Resolution: The german startup site is now renaming their project to avoid conflict with us. Yay!