- Joined
- Apr 8, 2010
- Messages
- 353
- Reaction score
- 15
When I bought my first domain 2 years ago I remember the very first recommendation godaddy made was that I purchase my own name .com. I didn't think much of it. Who would want my name anyway? Godaddy continued to suggest that I reg it. I continued to ignore. Godaddy relented. And I forgot about it. It wasn't until a few weeks ago when I finally regged it. In the ensuing weeks I've read several articles on people who regret not having bought their own dot com names. The feeling of relief from knowing that I own my dot com name is one I'd rather never lose (at least while I'm alive). I was fortunate to reg it for 2 reasons. 1) I don't have a common name 2) I'm neither a public/renowned figure nor a celeb.
Owning your dot com name allows you to be in a position to control your online identity whether for brand or personal reasons. Bill Gates could re-route billgates.com to thegatesnotes.com. Steve Jobs could redirect stevejobs.com to Apple's homepage or a page with emails/letters for shareholders and customers. George Lucas could redirect georgelucas.com to a page detailing new Star Wars ebooks and hardcopies on the market. Anderson Cooper could re-route andersoncooper.com to ac360.com. Unfortunately, these folks don't own their dot com names. And the list of people like these is longer than one might realize. I feel bad for Bill Clinton. He is probably the most popular political figure in recent times who's popularity actually surged beyond his presidency. The man is a political and charitable brand globally. But online? Not nearly as much. His dot com name would have been an easier way to get to his foundation site (what? you didn't know he had a foundation?).
Mark Zuckerberg is one lucky guy. I have no idea whether he regged his own name or bought it from someone else the same year he started Thefacebook. Either way it doesn't matter because he owns it. He could have used his domain to control his personal identity online in the months leading up to the premier of the Social Network, which he claims hasn't depicted the truth about what happened or the type of person he is.
Do you own your name .com? If not why haven't you regged it yet? Have you tried to purchase your name from someone else who had the same name? What was the outcome?
Owning your dot com name allows you to be in a position to control your online identity whether for brand or personal reasons. Bill Gates could re-route billgates.com to thegatesnotes.com. Steve Jobs could redirect stevejobs.com to Apple's homepage or a page with emails/letters for shareholders and customers. George Lucas could redirect georgelucas.com to a page detailing new Star Wars ebooks and hardcopies on the market. Anderson Cooper could re-route andersoncooper.com to ac360.com. Unfortunately, these folks don't own their dot com names. And the list of people like these is longer than one might realize. I feel bad for Bill Clinton. He is probably the most popular political figure in recent times who's popularity actually surged beyond his presidency. The man is a political and charitable brand globally. But online? Not nearly as much. His dot com name would have been an easier way to get to his foundation site (what? you didn't know he had a foundation?).
Mark Zuckerberg is one lucky guy. I have no idea whether he regged his own name or bought it from someone else the same year he started Thefacebook. Either way it doesn't matter because he owns it. He could have used his domain to control his personal identity online in the months leading up to the premier of the Social Network, which he claims hasn't depicted the truth about what happened or the type of person he is.
Do you own your name .com? If not why haven't you regged it yet? Have you tried to purchase your name from someone else who had the same name? What was the outcome?