Time for the people to speak...

[Adam DickerAdam Dicker is verified member.]

Anyone else think user to user praise should go?

-=DCG=-

 

[Ed30]

....and the Domain Security section.

 

[Cash Is King]

Originally posted by DotComGod
Anyone else think user to user praise should go?

-=DCG=-

Ace it! Thank you.

 

[Ed30]

Originally posted by Ed30
....and the Domain Security section.

Oops - it's already gone!

 

[SlashRoot.Com]

Originally posted by DotComGod
Anyone else think user to user praise should go?

-=DCG=-

Yes! "User feedback" -good or bad -would have been better.

Have you considered allowing buyer/sellers to rate the user/experience at the end of every transaction? Kind of like eBay or like RJ has implemented at NP. A numeric +/- count provides a much better picture than poetry.

That would also be very effective in setting apart good apples from the bad ones -over time.

 

[com]

Create a paid apprasial service and a section called 'Premium domains for sale'. Any domain that is appraised over $1,000 can be posted for sale into that section.

Thanks.

 

[puxa2]

I think the PM's should default to saving a copy of the message sent.

 

[GT Web]

Originally posted by peaceful
I think the PM's should default to saving a copy of the message sent.

yes, and a read receipt also default d

 

[puxa2]

Just wanted to say, in all honesty, I think DCG and the forum has the right attitude happening here regarding direction and member involvement.

Good luck!

 

[doubledee999]

Great job so far DCG, One thing I was thinking (this might have been mentioned already) was what about getting possibly some reps from these companies we seem to promote all the time?

i.e. Pool, Namewinner (think there used to be someone here), some of the registrars we are alway's plugging enom, etc., I think that most of these place's get alot of mixed publicity, and It would be nice to have a rep from them to answer some questions etc.

I think the only support people I have seen are snapnames and the first name here and there., they could in turn also be soliciting our business., Maybe some kind of partnership could be achieved with a registrar or drop club.

(not sure if these compaines would tell you to screw or not)

my two penny's

 

[WebCat]

Originally posted by DotComGod
Anyone else think user to user praise should go?

-=DCG=-

I like the idea of a count of negative and positive transactions!

Imagine two sellers:

one guy's record says.... 34 positive/2 negative
other guy's record says... 07 positive/19 negative

Who would you feel more trusting of with respect to $$$ transactions?

Ofcourse, there is alwys the possibility of abuse! So maybe some system of account who votes is appropriate, providing accountablilty. More a rating screen like this (pardon the crude graphics!):

TRANSACTION RATING FOR: Member Name
----------------------------------------------------------------
. Voter........Positive | Neutral | Negative
-----------------------------------------------------------------
1) buyer#1_____X___|_______|__________
2) seller#1_________|____X__|__________
3) seller#2 _____X___|_______|__________
4) buyer#4_________|_______|____X_____

OVERALL SCORE: Positive 2, Neutral 1, Negative 1

So- is this TOO complicated? This would be a fairly simple PHP script, using one SQL database. Sure would be useful and MUCH more realistic! Sort of like a BBB for DNForum, LOL!

WebCat

 

[puxa2]

Let it go

 

[TurNIC.com]

Originally posted by doubledee999
Great job so far DCG, One thing I was thinking (this might have been mentioned already) was what about getting possibly some reps from these companies we seem to promote all the time?

i.e. Pool, Namewinner (think there used to be someone here), some of the registrars we are alway's plugging enom, etc., I think that most of these place's get alot of mixed publicity, and It would be nice to have a rep from them to answer some questions etc.

I think the only support people I have seen are snapnames and the first name here and there., they could in turn also be soliciting our business., Maybe some kind of partnership could be achieved with a registrar or drop club.

(not sure if these compaines would tell you to screw or not)

my two penny's

This is really important. We had some unofficial reps before (maybe we still have I do not know) who were very useful.

Think about this DCG

 

[cyphix]

Any thought on the private drop club DCG?

 

[tigga]

1. Definitely do not bring retail buyers here - we have 2 levels of prices - one for us and one for retail buyers. If we educate retail buyers about us then we will lose retail prices.

2. Premium names for sale section - whether determined by poll valuations or by volunteers, this would be great - names worth over $1000 only.

3. Increase membership price substantially i.e. $200/year (and add on a bond amount e.g. $100) and don't let anybody else join. When a member wants to leave they get their bond back and then a place is open for the first person on the dnf membership waiting list. Bonds are also lost for inappropriate behaviour or if banned. I don't want to see more members here. The reason we are making good money is because the industry has not been "discovered" by the main stream population. The more people that enter, the less returns will be.

4. Instant communication with members as per my other thread which I wanted in the Suggestion Forum but got moved - http://www.dnforum.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=36114.

5. Enforce sales, wanteds, appraisals etc of adult domain names to be restricted to the Adult Domain Names section only - not in the Wanted, Valuations, Sales or any other threads.

 

[Steen]

wow nice ideas.

Users to praise needs to stay imo.

Am i that bad to be ecluded :-(

*sobs*

 

[Steen]

Originally posted by SirAlexFerguson

2. Don't let Mr. Fukhov Fukahanov come back...



SAF

Agreed but unfortuanatly him and his Bro have just joined, tonight.


:angry:

 

[.com.net.org]

Originally posted by devildude8989

Agreed but unfortuanatly him and his Bro have just joined, tonight.


:angry:

Haha, is he Vlad ?

 

[Zoobar]

Originally posted by DotComGod
Anyone else think user to user praise should go?

-=DCG=-

It should go.

 

[GT Web]

kill user praise....