Membership is FREE – with unlimited access to all features, tools, and discussions. Premium accounts get benefits like banner ads and newsletter exposure. ✅ Signature links are now free for all. 🚫 No AI-generated (LLM) posts allowed. Share your own thoughts and experience — accounts may be terminated for violations.

closed toronto.ws

This thread has been closed by the original author or DNF staff member.
Status
Not open for further replies.

paule

New Member
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2005
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
Hi, I have someone interested in toronto.ws could anyone please give me an estimated price I should ask for this name if I were to sell.

Thanks
 

NameTower

New Member
The Originals
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2003
Messages
2,886
Reaction score
0
I'd pay $100 for this name... and thats what its probably worth, maybe more.
You can PM me if that is something that would interest you.
 

Anthony Ng

@Nameslave
The Originals
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
May 22, 2002
Messages
4,567
Reaction score
14
I have always been struggling to buy/register (or not) non-local ccTLD domains with premium keywords, and toronto.ws would be a textbook example. Would keep an eye on its story. ;)
 

Nova

New Member
The Originals
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2003
Messages
1,335
Reaction score
0
Great name. Definitely not less than $x,xxx. $100 is absurdly low, regardless of it being a .ws. Moreover, .ws is not exactly undesirable.
 

furca

DNF Addict
The Originals
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2004
Messages
3,506
Reaction score
5
mid $xxx for this name
 

insomnia

DNF Regular
The Originals
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2002
Messages
869
Reaction score
0
Hmm, .ws to me is still pretty valueless. If you tell the domain to somebody, they won't know to type in .ws!
 

paule

New Member
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2005
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
Thanks everyone, I would have to agree with www $100 is way to low.
I think green.ws sold for a couple thousand on sedo not too long ago.
 

Dimva

High Traffic Domains
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2005
Messages
1,300
Reaction score
1
I say low- mid $XXX beacuse of the ext.
Thanks
Dimva
 

Wired

DNF Addict
The Originals
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2002
Messages
980
Reaction score
0
low $x,xxx

Very nice name.

Hard to find major cities with any unrestricted extension available.

GL with the name.

~Wired
 

Tippy

New Member
The Originals
Legacy Gold Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2002
Messages
2,972
Reaction score
1
I wouldnt consider anything below $X,XXX, its like a, if not THE, most popular Canadian City... besides Montreal ;)
 

carlton

Internet Real Estate
The Originals
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2004
Messages
931
Reaction score
0
Wired said:
low $x,xxx

Very nice name.

Hard to find major cities with any unrestricted extension available.

GL with the name.

~Wired
I agree with the common sense of Wired. Nice assessment.
 

Nova

New Member
The Originals
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2003
Messages
1,335
Reaction score
0
Nice to see some others come through on this.
 

StockDoctor

** Mr. Pink **
The Originals
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2002
Messages
2,455
Reaction score
0
I'm always surprised by the comments about lack of url-bar type-ins on these alternative extension names when appraised by some members. Who cares? These are just for search bar type-ins anyway. Then you look primarily at the keyword and whether the extension helps at all with seo. Toronto.ws (website) fits nicely, and I'd think with some optimization would be worth $x,xxx based on revenue. High $xxx on resale (for the name only) to a wholesaler.
Doc
 

jdk

DNF Addict
The Originals
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2004
Messages
6,351
Reaction score
27

Kevin

DNF Addict
The Originals
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
May 18, 2004
Messages
1,899
Reaction score
1
Hi,

.ws is a weak extension, but with the names of big cities, there is value.

High $xxx

Good potential for development.

Good luck.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom