Enjoy unlimited access to all forum features for FREE! Optional upgrade available for extra perks.
Domain summit 2024

Who's Your Daddy?

Status
Not open for further replies.

dtobias

Level 6
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2002
Messages
590
Reaction score
1
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
In an interesting UDRP case, GoDaddy won over the registrant of several domains using variants on "UpDaddy". An interesting aspect is that the registrar for those domains was GoDaddy itself. This point was raised by the respondent, who claimed that the UDRP lacked jurisdiction because the registrar/registrant agreement said that it was to be used for disputes with "any party other than us (the registrar)", and this dispute was actually with the registrar, so the policy didn't apply. The panel ruled that, since the dispute was regarding GoDaddy's trademarks rather than their role as a registrar, the policy did apply.

Another interesting point is whether GoDaddy really has trademark rights over other names with the generic word "daddy" in them. In this case, the domains in question were being used to offer domain registration services (in fact, those of GoDaddy itself, sold through an affiliate reseller program), so the ruling was based on "Daddy" being specifically associated with GoDaddy in the domain business.

It's also interesting that GoDaddy went the UDRP route, since their registration agreement actually gives them broad power to cancel offending registrations on their own initiative (a matter often raised as a concern by potential registrants). The complaint in fact notes that they first notified the registrants that they would cancel the registration under GoDaddy policy, but apparently they decided afterward to go through more formal channels and file a UDRP; maybe they were concerned that their unilaterally cancelling registrations without an outside arbitrator reviewing it might not hold up in court.
 
Domain summit 2024

Dave Zan

Level 8
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2004
Messages
1,700
Reaction score
10
Feedback: 1 / 0 / 0
Panel decisions have held that registration of a mark is prima facie evidence of validity, which creates a rebuttable presumption that the mark is inherently distinctive. Respondent has the burden of refuting this assumption.
Respondent has not attempted to rebut this presumption.

I didn't even know this was necessary for such a circumstance. Apparently
it does matter in this case.

A new thing learned.

Another new thing I also learned in this case is that it "set a limit" on the use
of disclaimers and/or disclosures to make itself distinct from the Complainant
in this case.

I wonder if the tide could've turned if the following occurred:

1. If the Respondent had trademarks with the words "up daddy" or even
just "up dad".

2. If the Respondent asked for 2 more panelists to "join in".

Unfortunately we'll never know.

dtobias said:
maybe they were concerned that their unilaterally cancelling registrations without an outside arbitrator reviewing it might not hold up in court.

To broadcast their message that they intend to uphold their trademarks,
perhaps?
 

Kevin

DNF Addict
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
May 18, 2004
Messages
1,899
Reaction score
1
Feedback: 42 / 0 / 0
I have been following the UpDaddy.com situation for several months, and when I first saw the domain I wondered why he chose a name that was unquestionably confusingly similar to GoDaddy.com.

The error in naming the business was bad enough, but then the owner of UpDaddy.com commenced on a very expensive Google AdWords campaign. UpDaddy.com was often at the top of various search terms that included the word “domains.” The cost-per-click rate must have been prohibitive; but clearly he was willing to put out a large investment for customer acquisition, hoping that it would pay off in the long run.

I had several conversations with some contacts at Wild West Domains about UpDaddy.com, and they confirmed that there was a serious problem. And although they could not tell me much about what was transpiring because of the trademark issue, it was confirmed that the amount of money spent by UpDaddy.com on advertising via AdWords was “unbelievably high.”

The ironic aspect of the UDRP case is that UpDaddy.com is a Wild West Domains (GoDaddy) reseller.

This case demonstrates quite clearly the importance of clearing trademark issues before commencing with business operations.

And that starts with this: COMMON SENSE

He did not need an attorney to tell him that UpDaddy.com is confusingly similar to GoDaddy.com – particularly when they are both in the same business: registering domains and selling related services.
 

Dave Zan

Level 8
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2004
Messages
1,700
Reaction score
10
Feedback: 1 / 0 / 0
Kevin said:
And that starts with this: COMMON SENSE

Agreed. But even that isn't so common. :dead:
 

Theo

Account Terminated
Joined
Feb 28, 2004
Messages
30,318
Reaction score
2,217
Feedback: 723 / 0 / 0
So now we know the real reason why Puff Daddy changed his name to P. Diddy. :-D
 

Dave Zan

Level 8
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2004
Messages
1,700
Reaction score
10
Feedback: 1 / 0 / 0
RADiSTAR said:
So now we know the real reason why Puff Daddy changed his name to P. Diddy. :-D

But Sean Combs could've used his millions (?) to defend it...if he'll bother to. :-D
 

ForumDomains

Level 5
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2004
Messages
364
Reaction score
0
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
davezan1 said:
But Sean Combs could've used his millions (?) to defend it...if he'll bother to. :-D

The same situation is about to unfold with Wild Best Domains which is currently owned by VoxDomains.com Registrar. They are Wild West Domains resellers too. I have tried to purchase that name from them just for the sport but they are too expensive at moment. :)
 

GeorgeK

Leap.com
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
May 17, 2002
Messages
2,248
Reaction score
64
Feedback: 3 / 0 / 0
It makes sense that GoDaddy would want to go after confusingly similar names, in advance of the Superbowl ad.
 

Steen

Level 9
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2003
Messages
4,853
Reaction score
1
Feedback: 18 / 1 / 0
Uh oh, now I am afraid for a Server _ _ _ _ _ domain I own :\
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

The Rule #1

Do not insult any other member. Be polite and do business. Thank you!

Sedo - it.com Premiums

IT.com

Premium Members

AucDom
UKBackorder
Be a Squirrel
MariaBuy

New Threads

Our Mods' Businesses

Free QR Code Generator by MerchArts
UrlPick.com

*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators

Top Bottom