- Joined
- Jul 8, 2007
- Messages
- 1,476
- Reaction score
- 43
Chill and bring something to the table here.. you are only making yourself look bad by making all these accusations and not providing a ounce of proof.
-
Welcome to DNForum.com - Domain Investor Forum, Free Domain Marketplace and a community for 45+ domain pros
If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the oldest global domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 45,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, using our free in-house built tools, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.
Why pool has OFFICIALLY lost my business.
- Thread starter theinvestor
- Start date
- Status
Chill and bring something to the table here.. you are only making yourself look bad by making all these accusations and not providing a ounce of proof.
draggar and zurc, thanks for chiming in. I'll be the first one to admit if there is a mistake somewhere but as you point out there is not much I can do about blind accusations without anything to follow up on.
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2007
- Messages
- 3,536
- Reaction score
- 13
Richard,
The last time we spoke you said you would be looking into the auctions and let us know when they would be reauctioned. Based from our last communication i got the impression that this would happen shortly. So, i just wanted to remind you i am still awaiting re-auction for the following names :
hrh.on.ca
fpf.ca
sar.ca
Could you please post updates in this thread.
The last time we spoke you said you would be looking into the auctions and let us know when they would be reauctioned. Based from our last communication i got the impression that this would happen shortly. So, i just wanted to remind you i am still awaiting re-auction for the following names :
hrh.on.ca
fpf.ca
sar.ca
Could you please post updates in this thread.
theinvestor,
Sorry for the delay, I have been in hospital getting a new hip and am now at home recuperating. I have put the question of status to my CS team and should know what's up early this week. I'll post the details as soon as I have them.
Richard
Sorry for the delay, I have been in hospital getting a new hip and am now at home recuperating. I have put the question of status to my CS team and should know what's up early this week. I'll post the details as soon as I have them.
Richard
Once the "winner" withdrew from the auction by not buying at his final bid, all his bids should be ignored when determining the winner of the auction.
If there were more than two bidders that placed bids in the auction, you should be the winner and pay the price required to outbid that 3rd bidder since at one point you placed a legitimate bid at a higher price. All the subsequent bidding was instigated by a fraudulant bidder. You should not have to go through another auction which could be manipulated when you placed bids in good faith. The auction process is simply a scam if you are asked to pay more than what was needed to beat the real bidders.
If there were more than two bidders that placed bids in the auction, you should be the winner and pay the price required to outbid that 3rd bidder since at one point you placed a legitimate bid at a higher price. All the subsequent bidding was instigated by a fraudulant bidder. You should not have to go through another auction which could be manipulated when you placed bids in good faith. The auction process is simply a scam if you are asked to pay more than what was needed to beat the real bidders.
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2007
- Messages
- 3,536
- Reaction score
- 13
cerno,
I agree but sadly they did not see my view.
Richard,
Thanks, get well soon.
I agree but sadly they did not see my view.
Richard,
Thanks, get well soon.
TheInvestor, You asked that I post a status on three domains you highlighted, namely hrh.on.ca, fpf.ca and sar.ca. I was not able to regain control of sar.ca and so this domain will not be re-auctioned. However, the other two I have under my control and will place in re-auction as originally planned within the next two weeks. All (save the defaulted bidder) original participants will be advised.
---------- Post added at 05:16 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:13 PM ----------
Cerno, I would suggets to you that there will be other bidders in the auction who wanted to enter into the fray higher than the third highest bid but never got the chance because of the agressive bidding of the two higher participants. These bidders would argue that a re-auciton is fair and allows them to participate where they were locked out before. And frankly, if they decide not to, then the auction will likely close at the third highest bid plus one increment anyway.
---------- Post added at 05:16 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:13 PM ----------
Cerno, I would suggets to you that there will be other bidders in the auction who wanted to enter into the fray higher than the third highest bid but never got the chance because of the agressive bidding of the two higher participants. These bidders would argue that a re-auciton is fair and allows them to participate where they were locked out before. And frankly, if they decide not to, then the auction will likely close at the third highest bid plus one increment anyway.
- Status
Similar threads
