Membership is FREE – with unlimited access to all features, tools, and discussions. Premium accounts get benefits like banner ads and newsletter exposure. ✅ Signature links are now free for all. 🚫 No AI-generated (LLM) posts allowed. Share your own thoughts and experience — accounts may be terminated for violations.

wipo case on av3.net

Status
Not open for further replies.

sitehq

DNF Regular
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2003
Messages
829
Reaction score
19
yahoo recently won over 40 names back but i thought this was stretch of any previosuly known case to simple assert two names, one trademarked, one not were synonomous.

in thier argument

The AV mark, the shorthand version of the AltaVista mark, has been continuously used by Overture and its predecessors-in-interest to identify its Internet-related services since at least as early as December 1998. The AltaVista and AV marks are synonymous...........

and further

This does however not exclude the possibility that such abbreviation / word may also be regarded as a distinctive trademark for non audio visual goods and services. Complainant has used AV together with the AltaVista trademark in such extent that the Panel finds it likely to believe that Complainant has established common law trademark rights to AV as an abbreviation for the famous AltaVista mark.



so say i have a name starting with av... and i put up a pay per clkick search page.

My question for those Trademark/ip attorney's out there..

is a search parking page a legit use of a name, or is it likely to be seen as a bad faith registration.

thanks for any help

Page Howe
www.trademarkip.com
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Who has viewed this thread (Total: 1) View details

The Rule #1

Do not insult any other member. Be polite and do business. Thank you!

Members Online

Premium Members

Upcoming events

Our Mods' Businesses

*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators

Top Bottom