closed 1.cc ; 5.cc ;168.cc

[pyrodesign]

edited:

 

[MerlinK]

edited:

 

[Nova]

edited:

 

[MerlinK]

Um.. I do? I don't deal with .ccs much and certainly wouldn't pay more than $200 for one.

There's nothing wrong with lowballing. One man's trash is another man's treasure -- it's all in the eye of the beholder.

-Merlin

 

[Nova]

edited:

 

[pyrodesign]

www, does "assuming on other people´s motivation without knowing about it" mean something to you? Or is this your training for your weekly discussion group?

 

[MerlinK]

pyro: touche.

 

[Nova]

www, does "assuming on other people´s motivation without knowing about it" mean something to you? Or is this your training for your weekly discussion group?

...could be nothing more than an attempt to set someone up to sell something worth a lot for just a little.

pyrodesign, does "could be" mean "could be," or "is"?

pyro: touche.

Not quite.

 

[pyrodesign]

Quote:
Originally Posted by MerlinK
There's nothing wrong with lowballing.


Wow, Merlin. Perry Mason could not have asked for more. And this is why one has to realize that your other post:

Quote:
Originally Posted by MerlinK
People, get real -- these are .cc's -- 1.cc is not worth more than $700 at the moment. Maybe in the future you can get $2,500 for it, but it would have to be a very motivated buyer.


...could be nothing more than an attempt to set someone up to sell something worth a lot for just a little.

basically what are your words implying? What were the words of lotsa of your other posts implying to others? Rather read through the whole lot of your posts, instead of taking one quote that includes a "could".

It´s what your words imply to other people - at least to me - not how you put your words....

 

[GT Web]

www: its obvious at this point you have no idea what you are talking about, absolutely none...

Its funny how some newbie choose to stand back and learn by reading other people's posts at this forum while you start making incredibly ridiculous posts - it looks badly upon yourself as well as on the domain 1.cc

 

[Nova]

You mean, the domain you've been trying so hard to downgrade in two threads, GT? That one? Oh.

 

[pyrodesign]

may I ask you a question, www, without wanting to offend you:
How old are you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------


btw to all, I would be happy to receive just a quarter of the attention that this thread receives in my thread:

 

[Leading Names]

10k? 100K? You’re nuts. Go and check out DNJournal.com and see what 10 – 100k buys you

This domain has little commercial value but is ideal for email and URL redirection. IMO it’s worth mid – high $$$ tops.

At the end of the day .CC is still a very minor extension.

- Rob

 

[GT Web]

thank you Rob, my thoughts exactly

 

[Ed30]

$200 on a good day (and before you ask, I have nil interest in buying this name at any price).

 

[alldig]

High $xx-Low $xxx to another newbie

 

[BiggieBiggie is verified member.]

mod note:

Please keep comments directed to the domain in question!

This is not a discussion, on who is most qualified to make an appraisal.

It is an appraisal thread for domain names only!

Your cooperation is appreciated.

 

[Mr Webname]

if I know the owner will sell it for $700~~even$1000~~
it is not a big cost~~I am just a Graduate student~~
I still have the ability to buy this~~~~
mhmm~~I will buy first~~~~~

Are you saying that you do not own the domain at present?

 

[jandy519]

Are you saying that you do not own the domain at present?

I have them~~
1.CC
5.CC
168.CC

 

[Mr Webname]

Okay - it seemed that you were saying that you were going to buy it!
Misunderstanding of language.