I've read some comments on .eu here and I'm wondering...in your opinion, in the US, will .eu surpass .cc as far as popularity? I remember a few years back, .cc was "the new .com" but it has obviously not lived up to that billing. I'm not saying .eu will be the second best TLD, just comparing the two.Thanks for replying.
Membership is FREE – with unlimited access to all features, tools, and discussions. Premium accounts get benefits like banner ads and newsletter exposure. ✅ Signature links are now free for all. 🚫 No AI-generated (LLM) posts allowed. Share your own thoughts and experience — accounts may be terminated for violations.
.cc (vs) .eu
- Thread starter yenyob
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2004
- Messages
- 368
- Reaction score
- 0
.cc has been 'artificially' introduced by VeriSign as a .com alternative (the same with .tv although it has much reliable connotations). .eu has got a good natural background (geography, business, no of citizens, etc.). I'd compare it rather to .us as a 'continental' extension.
and hello to you.sasquatch said:
I swear I hate know it all geeks that do nothing all day but try to make themselves feel better by belittling others on a MESSAGE BOARD.
hookah said:
good point. I was just curious as far as marketing goes.
I think .CC looks a bit unprofessional ; it may sound a bit like .COM but it is not .COM and anyone who knows what .CC stands for will find it unprofessional for a website not orientated to the Cocos Islands. Others may think it's a typo and type the .COM variant in their address bar.
I'd go for .EU which in my opinion is a very promising extention. However, unless you're a US citizen with European roots or unless your company has business links with Europe, I'd say you should leave the extention to the actual Europeans. Same goes with .US, which should be left for American citizens, American nationals, and business units in the US.
I'd go for .EU which in my opinion is a very promising extention. However, unless you're a US citizen with European roots or unless your company has business links with Europe, I'd say you should leave the extention to the actual Europeans. Same goes with .US, which should be left for American citizens, American nationals, and business units in the US.
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2002
- Messages
- 2,455
- Reaction score
- 0
I can't see .EU gaining much if any popularity in the US. CC works pretty much for credit cards and not much else imo. Where some large European companies use the .US extension for their US promotions, I can't see US companies doing the same thing when doing promotions in other countries. I'd think they would go with the ccTLD (such as .DE) for each country instead.yenyob said:
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2005
- Messages
- 2,997
- Reaction score
- 16
what does CC stands for?most People dont even know if CC exists but at least people know that EU ( european union) exists and its getting bigger and bigger so i dont think they will be surprise to hear EU has their own domain extension just like that of its currency
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2005
- Messages
- 8,426
- Reaction score
- 1,291
Yes, actually VeriSign is the registry for .cc too so it's no wonder they would promote the TLD.hookah said:
.cc has often been branded as 'credit cards' but we all know that .com is the 'real thing'. The average john duh on the street is often not aware of anything that's not .com. Trading under .cc you have a branding/identity problem IMO.
Saying that, I think .us & to some extent .eu have a bright future.
The TLD for the USA is not .com, it's .us. It IS America's TLD.
.eu is a supernational TLD and most European countries are used to their own ccTLD so we could live without .eu. The main benefit is for the EU institutions who will be able to move from .int to .eu.
In terms of economic and political power Cocos Islands vs EU/US do not compare... .cc is yet another exotic TLD to me but there are many worse.
The Cocos (Keeling) Islands in the Indian Ocean consist of two flat, low-lying coral atolls with an area of 14.2 square kilometres (5.4 sq. mi), 2.6 kilometres (1.6 mi) of coastline. People in west Texas have homesteads bigger than that.
I think a big factor in the future of many extentions is the fact that .com is the default extention in most browsers. When or if browsers start checking for multiple extentions when you type in a name or phrase, things could change drasticly. Dot eu over cc by a mile and dot com uber alles (at least for now).
I think a big factor in the future of many extentions is the fact that .com is the default extention in most browsers. When or if browsers start checking for multiple extentions when you type in a name or phrase, things could change drasticly. Dot eu over cc by a mile and dot com uber alles (at least for now).
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2005
- Messages
- 5,992
- Reaction score
- 150
To answer the original post, .eu and .cc are both not great as far as popularity goes in the US. You're much better off with a .com .us .net .org .biz or .info. Americans can't even buy .eu unless they have some connection to Europe. .cc is available to anyone but not a popular extension. Even though .cc is really a country code domain, it's been marketed as a .com alternative and many registrars feature it when you do searches for domains, so it has some visibility. To ask if .eu or .cc will be more popular in the US is almost a question not worth asking. If you had to choose between the two, .cc would probably be better since it has no restrictions on registration. I've always thought .cc is a nice looking extension too, and there have been some .cc sales of $1,000 to $4,000 lately. If anything .cc is slowly gaining more popularity, but I think it's because of it's affordability in the aftermarket. A good .cc keyword can be gotten for a very reasonable price.
- Status
Similar threads
