closed Fm.net

[shambles]

Pretty creme-de-la-cremeish methinks, but don;t know about a figure.

 

[Nolz91]

I don't think I can give an accurate value, but if this domain is yours, it's a gem!!!!

good luck

Nate

 

[Gerry]

minimum 50K. strong 2 letter .net. Enduser could be exceptionally higher. Imagine, the entire FM network in one place...fm.net

 

[JRBHosting]

I may be stretching it...100K?

Jason

 

[Theo]

According to WHOIS and Royal land registry records, you're living in a 270k quid flat - how can you not know about figures?

 

[shambles]

According to WHOIS and Royal land registry records, you're living in a 270k quid flat - how can you not know about figures?

lol. do you want to come round for tea too?

i know about 'figures'. I'm just not sure which figure applies for this particular domain.

 

[Gerry]

I may be stretching it...100K?

Jason

maybe not a stretch...I was kind of lowballing

According to WHOIS and Royal land registry records, you're living in a 270k quid flat - how can you not know about figures?

Man, you're freaking me out...

 

[Theo]

I'm a little sceptical, see. To have no idea about its worth means that you didn't buy it. But that'd mean you're with QNetwork.com or 100TopRadioSites.com (data from Archive.org) and neither WHOIS match. But they share the same nameservers, xsexpress.com - which is masked by WHOIS protection - and only 1 year old. So tell me, would I really find you at one of the most prestigious flats at Kings Cross in downtown London?

 

[shambles]

price paid and value are correlated of course, but they certainly aren't one and the same thing.

£270k isn't a prestigious flat in London and King's Cross certainly isn't a prestigious area. Happily I live in Bloomsbury, close to King's Cross, but no prostitutes.

 

[packeted]

Nice domain from a fellow Londoner I'd say mid $xx,xxx... Personally I'd move it to one of the larger registrars and add a few years to the registration..

 

[BostonDomainer]

price paid and value are correlated of course, but they certainly aren't one and the same thing.

£270k isn't a prestigious flat in London and King's Cross certainly isn't a prestigious area. Happily I live in Bloomsbury, close to King's Cross, but no prostitutes.

You have something against prostitutes? Anyways back to business.... wonderful 2 letter .net

Reseller: $75,000 no less
End User: $180,000 is more then generous for this name

 

[Theo]

Far from cynical; but you can call me a doubting Thomas until you convince me that you own it.

 

[GAMEFINEST]

very interesting thread...

 

[Johnn]

Dream on.

 

[Devil Dog]

Far from cynical; but you can call me a doubting Thomas until you convince me that you own it.

Checking these threads out: http://www.dnforum.com/showthread.php?t=209609 and http://www.dnforum.com/showthread.php?t=209004 whois is the same as fm.net so either:

1. He owns fm.net

or

2. He's pretending to be someone named Alex Hydes of Nottingham.

 

[sukantab]

Mid $xx,xxx at least...

 

[Theo]

2. He's pretending to be someone named Alex Hydes of Nottingham.

At least it's not Robyne Hude of Nottingham.

 

[Onward]

I would put fm.net at $150-200K (if I had to sell it)...I would not sell to a reseller for less.

 

[DNP]

$50-70k

 

[BostonDomainer]

At least it's not Robyne Hude of Nottingham.

Finally got the joke after the third read... lol

Gentleman, when a name like this comes up from someone who is not a frequent member (past few weeks) it does warrent some suspect. Facts remains that fm.net is one of the best .net names I have seen in a while on this forum and others and if Acroplex deems it worthy to inquire of the owner's rights to the name then I see nothing wrong with that since it is beneficial to the whole board that identity/ownership be clear for such an exceptional name.