• Welcome to DNForum.com - Domain Investor Forum, Free Domain Marketplace and a community for 45+ domain pros
    If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the oldest global domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 45,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, using our free in-house built tools, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.

How much a lawyer would charge for WIPO defense?

Status
Not open for further replies.

DanB

New Member
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2008
Messages
206
Reaction score
2
Hi,
I'd like to have an idea of how much a laywer charges to prepare my defense for WIPO. I'm not looking for an exact price, but just an average to have an idea if it's worth defend myself versus hire a laywer to do all the job.
Thank you -
 
The more important question is whether the proceeding is worth defending - i.e. whether you have a reasonable likelihood of success. If your position has no merit, then spending money on a defense is simply a waste of money.

Normally, I review a complaint, or at least discuss the apparent merits with the respondent, prior to providing a reliable estimate.

Some defenses are simpler than others. As noted in the thread about frontrunners.com, I may have to do a lot of work, or it may be a matter of simply slapping around Pedro the comatose midget to crank out a response, if the case turns on a relatively simple issue.

Because these things are fact specific, ranges of numbers are not helpful to what this particular dispute might involve. But I have gone anywhere from "SOB never paid his bill" to several thousand dollars. A significant component of that is whether to pay $2000 to WIPO in order to obtain a three member panel, which I strongly recommend for a variety of reasons, particularly if the case is something other than a simple common-fact-pattern defense.
 
Thank you John for your reply. Actually, I was asking because I know I will need to defend one of my names at WIPO soon, and for the first time. How I know it? The other party told me that they were going to WIPO if I didn't transfer the domain, and of course I won't.
The other party is a Fortune 500, but I have among my clients some Fortune 500 too, so I'm used to deal with the big guys, but as I said it's the first time I need to defend a domain and I don't personnaly know a lawyer specialized in UDRP cases.
Anyways, I will wait to see the complaint (if they really go ahead with this) to decide what to do.
But thanks again for the information.
Dan.
 
The other party told me that they were going to WIPO if I didn't transfer the domain

Don't be disappointed if they don't follow through. Threats are easy.

Now would be a good time for you to review your situation to make sure you are in a defensible position.
 
John, that's defi helpful bit :)

The more important question is whether the proceeding is worth defending - i.e. whether you have a reasonable likelihood of success. If your position has no merit, then spending money on a defense is simply a waste of money.

Normally, I review a complaint, or at least discuss the apparent merits with the respondent, prior to providing a reliable estimate.

Some defenses are simpler than others. As noted in the thread about frontrunners.com, I may have to do a lot of work, or it may be a matter of simply slapping around Pedro the comatose midget to crank out a response, if the case turns on a relatively simple issue.

Because these things are fact specific, ranges of numbers are not helpful to what this particular dispute might involve. But I have gone anywhere from "SOB never paid his bill" to several thousand dollars. A significant component of that is whether to pay $2000 to WIPO in order to obtain a three member panel, which I strongly recommend for a variety of reasons, particularly if the case is something other than a simple common-fact-pattern defense.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom