NameWinner Catches A Monster!!

[Whois-Search]

I think this about somes it up :

Gregory,

Are you still interested in the domain at your orginal bid of $12,600.00?

Kind regards,

Deborah Burditt
Director, Business Development
eNom, Inc.
2002 156th Ave NE #300
Bellevue, WA 98007
Phone (425) 274-4500 ext. 226
FAX (425) 952-0794
*****@eNom.com
http://www.eNom.com
"An ICANN Accredited & Anti-spam Registrar"

 

[cambler]

Yes, that sums it up nicely.

The winner did not pay, and before putting the name into public auction, Deborah gave the 2nd-place bidder a chance to have it. The name might very well go for more than $12,600 in public auction, but she gave the bidder a courtesy call at it because he was outbid by someone who did not pay.

The 2nd bidder declined, and so the name has gone into public auction.

 

[Whois-Search]

The question is who did not pay ? and what if Greg did pay ? and what is its current price and have they paid ?

 

[cambler]

The question is who did not pay ? and what if Greg did pay ?

The top bidder did not pay. Had Greg said he still wanted the name at his previous bid, he would have gotten it. The current price, at public auction, is $8,100, and the public auction ends on 9/20/04.

Come now, is this so difficult to understand? If you have a point, make it.

 

[Whois-Search]

Well lets see who's names in the whois on the 9/21/04

As it won't be Gregr

 

[dvdrip]

hhhmm
My question is: do you always contact the second bidder?

 

[cambler]

Well lets see who's names in the whois on the 9/21/04

As it won't be Gregr

Again, what's your point?

hhhmm
My question is: do you always contact the second bidder?

I don't know, as I'm not the one who does that. I just get the names, and mix it up on here because I'm a masochist (at least it feels that way 9 days out of 10)

 

[Steen]

Can we stop the Whois Vs. Ambler/Enom battle? :|

 

[Whois-Search]

As most of the high domain bidders are well known it will be interesting to see who paid 8k

If your going to play against people in this game you have to know your customers

And i'm not in a battle i'm in a discussion

 

[dvdrip]

This is why I told you before that trying to defend or explain all enom issues is not good for you, or enom.

Anyway I am 100% sure that enom is not contacting all second bidders.
Unless something changed in the last few days that I missed.
This creates an issue of inconsistency that is really bad to any company.

I think that you should only contact on technical issues concerning only drop catching. Even enom might not be so happy with what you are doing here.
I mean should protect yourself from us here.

I don't know, as I'm not the one who does that. I just get the names, and mix it up on here because I'm a masochist (at least it feels that way 9 days out of 10)

 

[cambler]

I think that you should only contact on technical issues concerning only drop catching.

You might very well be right. Too bad a few rabid people have to spoil it, though.

 

[Whois-Search]

Depends if you was contacting a deadbeat bidder or a millionaire domain buyer ?

 

[nitronet]

The top bidder did not pay. Had Greg said he still wanted the name at his previous bid, he would have gotten it. The current price, at public auction, is $8,100, and the public auction ends on 9/20/04.

Come now, is this so difficult to understand? If you have a point, make it.

OK here's the point.

Why should Greg pay you $12,600 for the name if the non paying bidder started running the name up at something much lower.

Only Enom knows who was bidding and what was bid and when and I don't see them or you telling us.

If Greg bid 6k and went back and forth with the non payer to $12,700 and then gave up, he should be offered the domain for 6K because all of the non payer's bids should be treated as fraud.

Pretty poor business to try to extract the fraud money from someone who pays by asking the second highest bidder to pay his top bid. If this didn't happen then show us.

Post the list of all the bidders and all the bids so we can all see what went on. You can change the names of the bidders to protect the innocent.

Enom must think they can make more by taking it public or they would have handled it differently.

I'm not trashing Enom, business is business, they are just trying to make the most money they can.