closed Nazism.net

[OXCELL]

A highly controversial term as indicated by the amount of views we see so far on this exchange.
It has no commercial value in my opinion.
If I were you I would dump it, it's bad news!

Best of luck to you

 

[Andrei73]

if you will look at topic data you can see thats 2 years old
athor developed site and have revenue with adsence (so this have commercial value

 

[Theo]

A highly controversial term as indicated by the amount of views we see so far on this exchange.
It has no commercial value in my opinion.
If I were you I would dump it, it's bad news!

Best of luck to you

Doh!

 

[Sarcle]

comparing christianity with nazism is very offensive to me and i ask Sarcle for apology and to remove his posts

I will not apologize, as what I stated is true.

I am not attacking your beliefs. I am only stating the truth.

I don't give a rat's ass what you believe in, keep it to yourself. You could believe cheese is the pasteurized necter of God's boob and pray that the skies rain down swiss for all I care.

Again I am not attacking an particular religion this just happens to be the biggie in the US. If you want you can add any other religon in what I said if you would like.

And if I had a nickel for every time I offended someone I would be well you know....Thank God this is America and I have the right to exercise my "FREEDOM OF SPEECH"

there is a great difference when you say bad christians and when you say bad christianity

I never said good Christians or bad Christians. Read below, and I will summarize.

the bible says obviously don't kill

I just love this phrase because I hear it so often.
My response:
Well the "bible" doesn't say that. It, the bible, is an inanimate object it doesn't talk. "People say that" according to what other people wrote.

Let's see catholic sanctioned killings. Well try to go by timelines.
November 27, 1059 ad. Pope Urban II called for the Crusade in a famous speech at the Council of Clermont. There were a total of 8 crusades that lasted until almost 1300 ad. Millions killed.

1230 ad. Pope Gregory IX began the Medieval Inquisition by setting up in Toulouse, France, the first permanent tribunal to deal with heresy. Hundreds of thousands died or were forced to renouce their believes or exile.

1478 ad. Pope Sixtus authorized the Spanish Inquisition. The Catholic faith was believed to be in danger from pseudo converts from Judaism (Marranos) and Islam (Moriscos). [/b]Well this is the most famous of all the inquisitions so I don't need to explain more.[/b]

1814 ad. The Spanish Inquisition was reintroduced by Ferdinand VII and approved by Pope Pius VII.

Let's not for get the indigenious people of the new americas that were tried, convicted and killed for their barbaric ways lest they convert to Christianity. In fact I think that's how the Spanish took over what is now Mexico, California, Texas, and several other lands. IN THE NAME OF CHRISTIANITY Meanwhile being sanctioned by the church.

So there is your history lesson.

and there was no good nazis ever

Your right about the fundamentalism. On this issue I agree. But to say there were no good nazis is crap. My fiances' great-grand father was (forced, or I guess more or less obligated) to serve in the war and is a very decent, caring man.

so seizing opportunities to attack other religions and believes on this forum is something intolerable and there are many christians here and would be offended by what sarcle said

So I offended you, get over it and open your eyes. There is a real world out there and it is waiting.

 

[Sarcle]

did here someone mumbling something? I saw you reading this and no reply..

Go ahead "gotasale." Do you have something to add? I never went after anyone's beliefs, but do you want to contest this? Facts, vs. Fiction. You are offended prove me wrong that christians haven't killed more than nazis'.


Good luck if you want to count body for body your belief will fall. So am I lying? no it is the truth.....

I had no idea what you believed in. But if you want to go toe to toe? I will shred you..................

Again who killed more and who killed less? that is proven, not in the bible but in the history texts. do you want to argue with me? I have proven to you that Christians killled more that any Nazi ever did...................

That is what I thought.....good luck.......with what you believe.

Let's see...hmmm....no one has your back...because christians have killed more than any other organization........

Do you want another spanking? I suggest not. Again I agree that this is ideal is wrong, but if you want to come after me with an offense the you better prove it. You are wrong and everone knows it, whether you want to believe it or not. Facts are facts and that is what turn's the world.

 

[NickStagg]

Sarcle dont throw salt on the wound, thats just not necessary. What you said before was intelligent and well thought through, be the bigger man and show some humility.

 

[csitenet]

its a rather specific/popular keyword. I would think if developed right its worth a good $x,xxx min, right now... about $50 ! the (ism) kills it...

just because its natzism i don't know why people suddently start saying $0 $0 $0....

because its racist?

to me its educational... intresting to see how the wounds of WWI and WWII yet havn't healed... The word "nazi" brings out the worse in some brits i know YET the word "apartheid" does Very little if not NONE...

I'd be intrested to see how a German national sees this, i know that russia is definatly at the Start point of becoming a very racist society... where the poor are targetted! alot of ANTI-Chechnyans and Vice versa ANTI-Russian on the chechnyan side!

I won't even start on the racism in America

 

[Dale Hubbard]

its a rather specific/popular keyword. I would think if developed right its worth a good $x,xxx min, right now... about $50 ! the (ism) kills it...

just because its natzism i don't know why people suddently start saying $0 $0 $0....

because its racist?

to me its educational... intresting to see how the wounds of WWI and WWII yet havn't healed... The word "nazi" brings out the worse in some brits i know YET the word "apartheid" does Very little if not NONE...

I'd be intrested to see how a German national sees this, i know that russia is definatly at the Start point of becoming a very racist society... where the poor are targetted! alot of ANTI-Chechnyans and Vice versa ANTI-Russian on the chechnyan side!

I won't even start on the racism in America

Excellent POV CSite. You're keeping to the main idea here -- the value of the domain, and not a giant subjective debate on what it all means. Opinions are like -- you know what -- everyone has one. Lord Russell of Liverpool called his book about the German Nazi era "The Scourge of the Swastika". Not a lot of people know that the swastika was a religious emblem and still is, and was even before the Nazis adopted it. So maybe Russell could have thought twice about his book title. And I'm a Brit and my father was a veteran RAF pilot, so I have no fondness for Nazis. I just happen to own the domain nazis.org. My father went on in 1958 to be seconded to an RAF mission to Germany to teach Luftwaffe pilots to fly. He had a lot of good friends who were previously Nazi card carriers. The he taught the Saudi Air Force how to fly jets in 1971. All Muslims. So what? Also, anyone ever heard of the Kempei Tei and imperialism? How about the Brit imperialists?

Look at old Bob Mugabe -- then maybe Idi Amin -- look all over the world. There are tyrant bastards everywhere. Well, I'll take a chance and vouch an opinion: The Brits ought to be clearing up after themselves in Africa now instead of pissing around in Iraq where they have no legitimacy to be.

I think the reality of this appraisal is that one has to make these sites of historical interest, and try to create an objective resource. I also think that having a forum with the site is a definite 'no-no' as has already been indicated by some of these posts. Very inflammatory and pointless as all it results in is endless gainsaying.

I see that the owner of nazism.net has gone ahead and made a nice start. That's the way I think I will go. Now enough bigotry and aggravation -- what are these domains worth? I have my own thread for my nazis.org appraisal and I don't wish to steal this one.

I like the way nazism.net has been started and of course it's worth $x,xxx. I already checked the adsense opportunity and it throws up mediocre ads, but it's not always necessary to have fun creating a good domain just by earning from it. There are plenty of people who will take these historical domain opportunities and run with them. The secret is trying to keep them out of the wrong hands -- if you care -- that's a secret to which the answer will always elude.

Oh and to answer something raised by a previous poster, a German national would not be allowed by law to operate nazism.net or nazis.org.

Out of interest, I asked the Simon Wiesenthal Institute for an opinion an how to deal with nazis.org and they were so rude to me that I had to telephone them and give them stick.

Flame on!

 

[FineE]

... Oh and to answer something raised by a previous poster, a German national would not be allowed by law to operate nazism.net or nazis.org. ...
QUOTE]

I initially thought the same thing, and I am far from an expert on German law, but www.nazis.de is an active site.

 

[Restecpa]

Great post aZooZa. Keeping it out of the wrong hands and making sure we do our best to urge our angry and often frustrated youth to think twice before taking the wrong path (or even just wrong assumptions), is very important for me too. The site as it is now is just a start, a few pages that were put together fast so it doesn't just stand there, not to mentioned to get indexed which won't hurt it either. More content is comming eventually and major redesign is just a question of time and energy. I've had a few inquiries, but decided not to show much interest in selling right now. Perhaps a nice sum and assurance that the site will be used in anti-nazism spirit would make me change my mind, but until then I will do my best to create an usefull resource out of it, for everyone interested in our not so distant history. I for one see a great potential that this domain caries if used properly.

Thanks to all who participated in this discussion so far

 

[Dale Hubbard]

... Oh and to answer something raised by a previous poster, a German national would not be allowed by law to operate nazism.net or nazis.org. ...
QUOTE]

I initially thought the same thing, and I am far from an expert on German law, but www.nazis.de is an active site.

I must admit to being surprised that's live. Maybe our great European Court of Human Rights has again interfered with the will of individual EU participants?

Great post aZooZa. Keeping it out of the wrong hands and making sure we do our best to urge our angry and often frustrated youth to think twice before taking the wrong path (or even just wrong assumptions), is very important for me too. The site as it is now is just a start, a few pages that were put together fast so it doesn't just stand there, not to mentioned to get indexed which won't hurt it either. More content is comming eventually and major redesign is just a question of time and energy. I've had a few inquiries, but decided not to show much interest in selling right now. Perhaps a nice sum and assurance that the site will be used in anti-nazism spirit would make me change my mind, but until then I will do my best to create an usefull resource out of it, for everyone interested in our not so distant history. I for one see a great potential that this domain caries if used properly.

Thanks to all who participated in this discussion so far

Agree of course. The key is not to have a public forum where the bigots can screw it all up. You're on the right track. Maybe we should combine. Anyway, mine's in good hands. http://www.nazis.org