For Sale NSI Creation Dates

[HLK]

What's up with NSI changing the creation dates on Domains?
I have noticed Domains registered way back showing
much more recent creation dates.

Has anyone else noticed this and why are they doing it?

 

[HLK]

I should have given an example:

Domain Name: ANY.NET

Administrative Contact, Billing Contact:
Marshall, Richard (rm667) [email protected]
PO Box 4492
Lexington, KY 40544-4492
US
859.276.3636 fax: 859.276.1360
Technical Contact:
Marshall, Richard (RM667) [email protected]
PO Box 4492
Lexington, KY 40544-4492
US
859.276.3636 fax: 859.276.1360

Record last updated on 16-May-2003.
Record expires on 11-Apr-2004.
Record created on 10-Oct-2002.
Database last updated on 2-Jun-2003 21:05:07 EDT.


http://DomainResource.com

 

[Kid Kool]

yes i noticed this too. also i noticed a couple of domains i have snaps on the domain expireation dates changed... to a few months later. In any case it's just more proof of netsol's incompetence.

 

[Kid Kool]

The following table highlights the change(s) in ****

Old Values

Record expires on 20-Jul-2003.
Record created on 20-Jul-2001.


New Values

Record expires on 21-Sep-2003.
Record created on 15-Oct-2002.

 

[Digital Address]

Seems to be only on SnapNames "updates." No mention yet from any of the other services!

 

[HLK]

It shows the same on any whois service also.

Something strange going on..

 

[DomainGoon]

Domain owners are required to keep accurate WHOIS info, but I guess domain registrars aren't?

Netsol should be required to fix the incorrect data just like a domain owner has to keep his or her data correct.

 

[Kid Kool]

its going to suck big time if the dates don't change back

 

[RMF]

http://www.dnforum.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=31573

RMF

 

[Kid Kool]

Originally posted by RMF
http://www.dnforum.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=31573

RMF

It's not a snapnames problem, its a problem with networksolutions

 

[mole]

Originally posted by kidkool
its going to suck big time if the dates don't change back

I agree. .COM value is appreciated by the fact that it was first registered a long time ago. I suspect if the name drops and is deleted, Verisign treats it like it never existed and the clock starts all over again. Just a plausible guess.

 

[RMF]

I know, I was just posting that link so he could see that there was another thread about this.

RMF