OK, I read the full judgement. And for most of it, I was shocked at what appeared to be occurring.
Then I got to the bit where the use of the site changed so that links claiming to be to myspace.com were in fact going to ebay.com. Now, I may be naive, but is that what happens when you park a domain? That sounds like something you'd have to develop to me. And that appears to be the crux of the decision.
Please read the judgement through
http://www.nic.uk/digitalAssets/27270_myspace.pdf- the Respondent made a big mistake here, it seems to me, though this view may attract criticism.
On most key points, the Expert appeared to hold with the Respondent's assertions. But this "change of use" appeared to swing it. If the domain had just remained parked without any hint of development to redirect traffic intended for myspace.com, the fact that links to myspace.com had begun to appear on myspace.co.uk would not have constituted a change of use and the Expert would have found for the Respondent.
Just my two-pennies worth and time may make me a liar, but my feeling is this
shouldn't have implications regarding reverse hijacking of parked domains...
I do however stand to be corrected
