closed Roulettes .CO any value??

[syncvb]

I have Roulettes . CO ??
How much should I expect ??

 

[hugegrowth]

Reg fee or less, I think the 's' really hurts it. No one uses the word Roulettes

 

[Melly]

the plural hurts it.

 

[WhoDatDog]

The name is worth less than zero. It isn't even worth anything in the singular. How anyone can even claim it is worth anything above zero is beyond me. Names like these are cancerous names. It is actually worth in the negative. Here you are making a thread about a name that is worth less than zero. Time is money.

There is no earthly reason why it should have any value, and therefore, it doesn't. If you take my post seriously you will save a lot of money and at some point you will thank me. Don't take it as a personal attack, but this name represents the exact opposite of everything that makes a name have value.

The type of insight that it takes to come up with this name is not the type of insight that will make you money in this business. Shame on the Registrar for allowing you to register this, and shame on all of the pumpers of this horrible extention. Shame on the .co registry, too, they represent the lowest of the low when it comes to domaining.

Shame on everyone else who doesn't tell it like it is and allows these new domainers to waste all of their time and money on this crap.

 

[hugegrowth]

I agree saying reg fee in my earlier post was probably generous.

The singular, however, would not be worthless IMO.

 

[BostonDomainer]

The name is worth less than zero. It isn't even worth anything in the singular. How anyone can even claim it is worth anything above zero is beyond me. Names like these are cancerous names. It is actually worth in the negative. Here you are making a thread about a name that is worth less than zero. Time is money.

There is no earthly reason why it should have any value, and therefore, it doesn't. If you take my post seriously you will save a lot of money and at some point you will thank me. Don't take it as a personal attack, but this name represents the exact opposite of everything that makes a name have value.

The type of insight that it takes to come up with this name is not the type of insight that will make you money in this business. Shame on the Registrar for allowing you to register this, and shame on all of the pumpers of this horrible extention. Shame on the .co registry, too, they represent the lowest of the low when it comes to domaining.

Shame on everyone else who doesn't tell it like it is and allows these new domainers to waste all of their time and money on this crap.

You are trying WAY too hard buddy to present yourself as an expert. No one is impressed by you. You haven't really giving out any real advise to the guy lol. Not "shame on everyone else" shame on you. Every few years one like you come along Shame on us all for not "telling it how it is" homie!! If you're going to make a lengthy post- build up the vocabulary and say something of substance... anyways... it's a "shame".

 

[katherine]

What's the reg fee ? $29 something ?
I don't think it would even sell for $29 so it's worth < reg fee.

 

[David G]

Worth less than the sky high .co reg fee with the ending 's' even if in a better extension.

 

[WhoDatDog]

You are trying WAY too hard buddy to present yourself as an expert. No one is impressed by you. You haven't really giving out any real advise to the guy lol. Not "shame on everyone else" shame on you. Every few years one like you come along Shame on us all for not "telling it how it is" homie!! If you're going to make a lengthy post- build up the vocabulary and say something of substance... anyways... it's a "shame".

The name is worth less than zero. It is not just a worthless name, but a cancerous name, and a cancerous extention. He would be wise to take my advice. If people don't try to help these newcomers out then they will waste valuable years of their lives. The problem is that nobody will step up and do the right thing and expose the FRAUD in this business.

If it was just a regular name that didn't make sense, then maybe a less harsh reponse would be the best way to go about it. The problem is that this guy would never even dream of coming up with this name if the ROTTEN FRADULENT SCAM extention wasn't given credibility by those "old timers" who are trying to fleece newcomers with their garbage registrations.

The extention is a WORTHLESS SCAM. End of story. Scammers and pumpers can run around all day and sell the names to each other and come up with other false sales to get published in Dn Journal. I will shun those people and wish them misery.

 

[Theo]

A "cancerous extention" - now that's rich. I'm sure you're the doctor for all domainers.

 

[BostonDomainer]

A "cancerous extention" - now that's rich. I'm sure you're the doctor for all domainers.

uh oh... do I smell a new DomainGang.com piece... "Dr. Who?/WhoDatDog" lol.

 

[syncvb]

Thanks all for your kind (!) appraisals.
I am just listening to your replies and don't have anything to say just because I am just learning and hope to get something better in my hands now onwards.

 

[gilescoley]

I think the "s" hurts the name a lot, dont see you getting much for it. I would try and sell it to a fellow domainer?

The singular would be worth a bit, you only have to look at the some of the xx,xxx .co sales to see that

WhoDatDog, whatever your'e on, I dont want any lol

 

[Stinos]

yes, the "s" kills the name. Reg fee