You can't really ban someone for failing to respond. Then you only have one person's side of things.Does anyone know why he hasn't been banned yet? Failure to respond should at least raise some suspicion?
No one is saying you are lying. Plus, no one should really need "proof". And the proof will still not force the other side to respond.two years ago is not the point...i have 100 emails to him every month trying to track him down...i was lucky enough to find he was on this site...but how lucky was it?? why do you keep bring up two years....he strung me out for over 6months not being able to complete the work...the only thing that is two years is that i actually found where i could post knowing he would see it
negative feed back should stick regardless....he is a website provider ripping people off. buy removing it you let him potentially rip someone else off.
if thats what they wannado on this site that is fine...but they are not giving any of the subscribers any protiential protection.
he sees this all...he doesn't repond because he knows he is wrong.
---------- Post added at 07:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:42 PM ----------
some proof coming btw
Wasn't there a thread on DNF that stated something along the lines that Mike Cohen (mike031) ripped someone off?
I can't seem to find it now. Was it the same issue, and if so, was it deleted?
Correct.1. i see that you gave him a negative feedback. The deal didn't take place here so the trader rating isn't valid. He can dispute it and get it removed.