Membership is FREE – with unlimited access to all features, tools, and discussions. Premium accounts get benefits like banner ads and newsletter exposure. ✅ Signature links are now free for all. 🤖 Connect your own LLMs and agents through DNF AI Hub, similar to tagging @grok on X - Ask questions, research domains, and get AI help directly inside DNForum.
-
Welcome to DNForum.com™ - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars
If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the oldest global domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 45,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, using our free in-house built tools, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.
An important message from Snapnames
- Thread starter areav
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2004
- Messages
- 490
- Reaction score
- 1
Are you going to take it?
:shy: Total Rebate $35.45 
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2005
- Messages
- 8,426
- Reaction score
- 1,292
Just had a quick glance but yes there is a waiver.
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2006
- Messages
- 2,914
- Reaction score
- 4
This offer is dependent upon your executing and returning to Rust Consulting, Inc., a third party administrator that is assisting with the administration of this rebate offer, the accompanying Rebate Offer Acceptance Agreement (link below) which, among other things, waives any claims you may have against SnapNames and its affiliates relating to this matter. This offer is open for twelve months from todayâs date. If the offer is not accepted within this time frame, then the rebate will no longer be available.
I also received my rebate offer but it was for barely over $1000 which I believe it is vastly under the amount due (although I have no way to know for sure with our account history removed).
Anyone else think their number doesn't look right? I just emailed Snapnames demanding my account history, I doubt they will send it but I did tell them I would be moving my portfolio of thousands of names away from Moniker if it can not be provided.
What a mess.
Anyone else think their number doesn't look right? I just emailed Snapnames demanding my account history, I doubt they will send it but I did tell them I would be moving my portfolio of thousands of names away from Moniker if it can not be provided.
What a mess.
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2004
- Messages
- 3,298
- Reaction score
- 24
Actually is about what I expected, at some point I started fight Halvarez - bumping him (he had a bidding pattern) and he left me alone a lot, also I was always bitvhing to Nelson so he knew he better elave me alone or I will poke.
Handful of people are in hundreds of thousands, that's a merry christmas
Handful of people are in hundreds of thousands, that's a merry christmas
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2009
- Messages
- 216
- Reaction score
- 0
BTW, if we actually figure out which day he missed from work we will know for sure if he worked alone or someone helped him. We can run those days against our bidding history and see if the day he missed work he was bidding.
Anybody has an "Out of office" email from Nelson?
Anybody has an "Out of office" email from Nelson?
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2006
- Messages
- 2,914
- Reaction score
- 4
Yes, but how do we know there were no other shillbid accounts used against us?
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2003
- Messages
- 92
- Reaction score
- 2
Anyone who receives an offer, especially those who were offered large amounts, should be especially insistent that they receive their historical data.
They seem to have arrived at these figures very quickly, I doubt if they were properly double-checked or sanity-tested, they will almost certainly have made mistakes in some cases, the only way to be sure is for us to comb over our data ourselves.
They are only offering this to buy you off and so that they can later claim, in any possible court case, that they did their best to remedy the situation - it will not look good for them, however, if they rejected persistent and widespread requests to hand over the data they starting hiding just a few months ago.
They seem to have arrived at these figures very quickly, I doubt if they were properly double-checked or sanity-tested, they will almost certainly have made mistakes in some cases, the only way to be sure is for us to comb over our data ourselves.
They are only offering this to buy you off and so that they can later claim, in any possible court case, that they did their best to remedy the situation - it will not look good for them, however, if they rejected persistent and widespread requests to hand over the data they starting hiding just a few months ago.
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2004
- Messages
- 476
- Reaction score
- 5
Impressed?? The company robbed people of hundreds of thousands of dollars. They have no choice, as lawsuits and government intervention will crush SnapNames and destroy Oversee if they don't do what's right and proper.
Any idiot can see that this couldn't possbily be limited to one person or one i.d., so in effect anything SnapNames does is not in the interest of their users but to protect their on-the-way-to-jail asses and the parent company's goodwill.
I must say I am amazed at how easily and fully people can be looted and then so quickly forgive (look at the poll results.).
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2004
- Messages
- 30,303
- Reaction score
- 2,217
Oversee is making a fatal mistake with this case. They won't avoid getting sued, they are clearly trying to just minimize the size of the potential class. If I don't get my auction history reinstated or provided I will be talking to a lawyer.
- Status
