If people are to guesstimate that browsers render .mobi useless, then if I have a name in a mobi that is a fully developed site while it's counterparts in .com, .net, .info, .org, .co.uk, .de are all parked, isn't that a waste of technology.
Point being, who wants to look at a parked page in every damn extension?
I applaud all those that believe parking is the domainer's friend and the only option they have.
And to those that feel the browser is the answer to every thing, I really can't argue that point too much because it will take a while for the, um...nearly 4.5 billion cell phones in use, to be traded in and upgraded.
Until everyone's crystal ball catches up to reality, nothing says mobile better (and mobetter) than mobi.
i just picked the idn up
"espÃritusanto.com" where can i park this??? it mean holyspirit in spanish.
I actually saw that and almost regged it about a week ago.
I have luck at both name drive and sedo for espanol domains, perhaps better at sedo. I have been known to switch back and forth.
What matters most is the keyword to get the traffic looking to begin with. In your case, perhaps catholic or vatican will help bring in more traffic.
Why increase expenses when browser technology is advancing faster than mobile development?
does this sentence make sense?
Browser technology is advancing faster than mobile development???
You mean in the time it takes for me to make a mobile site ALL browsers will be up to speed?
I know it is easy to find out where the traffic comes from, it still doesn't tell you how many will type in .(IDN)
I guess I need step by step instructions on how to get domains on this "second tier" so I can take full advantage of Chinese traffic.