• Welcome to DNForum.com - Domain Investor Forum, Free Domain Marketplace and a community for 45+ domain pros
    If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the oldest global domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 45,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, using our free in-house built tools, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.

closed investmernt.com - Appraise

This thread has been closed by the original author or DNF staff member.
Status
Not open for further replies.

invester123

New Member
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2009
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
Could you please comment on the following domain:-

investmernt.com

Just a bit of background, as you all probably know investment.com sold in 2007 for 900k, investments.org for 12k.....and investment1.com for $500.
 
It's worth nothing unless it gets traffic that converts to $.

- Rob
 
Depends on type-in traffic and revenue.
No Traffic & No Revenue = $0
 
No value without typo traffic that converts. It's not a name you can build a site around.

-Scott
 
Lets hope investment.com is developed on then :) . Thanks for your comments.
 
Ditto. The sole value of typos is in the type-in traffic they receive.
You just redirect the traffic elsewhere, but you usually don't build a site on a typo.
 
If someone developed 'investment.com' then this domain could be quite valuable for type in traffic, but at the moment its just parked.

Suppose its just a waiting game with this one. I wonder if I could sell it for a mid $xx?
 
As said above, it all boils down to (type-in) traffic... whether investment.com is developed or not won't make a big difference imho.
 
Right, typo name values are almost always based strictly on traffic and lacking traffic usually no value beyond reg fee. Makes zero difference what the correct spelling name sold for.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom