I don't think so.
Let's just hope they have muzzle awareness and everything should be fine.
Second official warning before a 72-hour timeout.haha, it was approved security detail. You're so stupid
You're showing your bias yet again. Don't give him a warning, give me a warning.
No, you're just proving that I'm right, digging your hole deeper and deeper. Using examples that have nothing to do with the Rittenhouse case. You just keep posting approved outings, security details etc. All in the daylight, with many people.
Apparently when your side calls people in this thread:
For the second time: Report it.
I just did. You just quoted it. It's not the first time, why should I expect you to do anything? Go ahead and give him public warnings like you've done with others, you consider left leaning.
Because they can't stop with directed personal attacks. The mixed bag was arguing the point, again, that they were previously warned about doing instead of letting it go, resulting in a 72-hour ban.
I disagree. I may have been wrong but it would have gone one of two ways, he was attacked by white rioters or they would have not talked about race and buried it, not charges.
With how the left treats People of Color that stray from the narrative, I'm more inclined the believe that a Black person would have been charged, but his race and photos would be buried, and possibly even the trial coverage until a 'not guilty' verdict.
